Literature DB >> 11970798

Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades.

Eyal M Reingold1, Dave M Stampe.   

Abstract

The present study investigated saccadic inhibition in both voluntary and stimulus-elicited saccades. Two experiments examined saccadic inhibition caused by an irrelevant flash occurring subsequent to target onset. In each trial, participants were required to perform a single saccade following the presentation of a black target on a gray background, 4 degrees to the left or to the right of screen center. In some trials (flash trials), after a variable delay, a 33-msec flash was displayed at the top and bottom third of the monitor (these regions turned white). In all experimental conditions, histograms of flash-to-saccade latencies documented a decrease in saccadic frequency, forming a dip, time-locked to the flash and occurring as early as 60-70 msec following its onset. The fast latency of this effect strongly suggests a low-level, reflex-like, oculomotor effect, which was referred to as saccadic inhibition. A novel procedure was developed to allow comparisons of saccadic inhibition even across conditions, which in the absence of a flash (no-flash trials) produce dissimilar saccadic reaction times (SRTs) distributions. Experiment 1 examined the effects of the fixation stimulus on saccadic inhibition by contrasting three conditions: a gap condition (fixation stimulus disappeared 200 msec prior to target onset), a step condition (offset of the fixation stimulus was simultaneous with target onset), and an overlap condition (the fixation stimulus remained on for the duration of the trial). The overlap condition produced substantially stronger saccadic inhibition, relative to the gap and the step conditions. Experiment 2 contrasted the saccadic inhibition effect obtained for prosaccades (saccades aimed at the target) with the effect obtained for antisaccades (i.e., saccades aimed away from the same target). The onset of saccadic inhibition was earlier, and its magnitude was stronger, for antisaccades, relative to prosaccades. The plausibility that the superior colliculus is the neurophysiological locus of the saccadic inhibition effect was explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11970798     DOI: 10.1162/089892902317361903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  68 in total

1.  Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Antimo Buonocore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Computational modeling of collicular integration of perceptual responses and attention in microsaccades.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Bottom-up effects modulate saccadic latencies in well-known eye movement paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia van Stockum; Michael R Macaskill; Tim J Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-21

5.  Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance.

Authors:  David R Evens; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Dissociable saccadic suppression of pupillary and perceptual responses to light.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Paola Binda
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Are somatosensory saccades voluntary or reflexive?

Authors:  Richard Amlôt; Robin Walker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Preparation and execution of saccades: the problem of limited capacity of computational resources.

Authors:  Uwe J Ilg; Yu Jin; Stefan Schumann; Urs Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.