R G Jones1, I Davagnanam, S Colley, R J West, D A Yates. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, UK. jonesradiology@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Thromboembolism is a recognized complication occurring during endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Recently, there has been much interest in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to treat such complications, but the evidence is limited. We reviewed our use of one such agent, abciximab, which we commonly administer and believe to be a safe and suitable rescue agent in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases in which abciximab was administered in our institution between 2001 and 2007. Clinical outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months. Good outcome was defined as no significant clinical sequelae compared with baseline status or clinical improvement (mRS < 2). Poor outcome was defined as no resolution of a new clinical deficit that developed postprocedure at 6 months (mRS > 2). Angiographic appearance of thromboembolic phenomena and posttreatment outcome was assessed with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scale. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included, with good outcome observed in 30 (79%) and poor outcome in 8 (21%) patients. Angiographic improvement based on TIMI scoring was seen in 24 (63%) patients, and no improvement was seen in 14 (37%). In 4 patients (11%), good outcome was obtained at 6 months despite no angiographic improvement on TIMI. No cases of intracranial rebleed or additional neurologic deficit following administration of abciximab were encountered. CONCLUSION: In this small retrospective series, abciximab was safe and effective when used as a rescue agent for thromboembolic complications encountered during coiling of intracerebral aneurysms.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Thromboembolism is a recognized complication occurring during endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Recently, there has been much interest in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to treat such complications, but the evidence is limited. We reviewed our use of one such agent, abciximab, which we commonly administer and believe to be a safe and suitable rescue agent in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases in which abciximab was administered in our institution between 2001 and 2007. Clinical outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months. Good outcome was defined as no significant clinical sequelae compared with baseline status or clinical improvement (mRS < 2). Poor outcome was defined as no resolution of a new clinical deficit that developed postprocedure at 6 months (mRS > 2). Angiographic appearance of thromboembolic phenomena and posttreatment outcome was assessed with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scale. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included, with good outcome observed in 30 (79%) and poor outcome in 8 (21%) patients. Angiographic improvement based on TIMI scoring was seen in 24 (63%) patients, and no improvement was seen in 14 (37%). In 4 patients (11%), good outcome was obtained at 6 months despite no angiographic improvement on TIMI. No cases of intracranial rebleed or additional neurologic deficit following administration of abciximab were encountered. CONCLUSION: In this small retrospective series, abciximab was safe and effective when used as a rescue agent for thromboembolic complications encountered during coiling of intracerebral aneurysms.
Authors: E J Topol; J J Ferguson; H F Weisman; J E Tcheng; S G Ellis; N S Kleiman; R J Ivanhoe; A L Wang; D P Miller; K M Anderson; R M Califf Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-08-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gregory J Velat; Matthew V Burry; Eric Eskioglu; Rebecca R Dettorre; Christopher S Firment; Robert A Mericle Journal: Surg Neurol Date: 2006-04
Authors: Joon K Song; Yasunari Niimi; Patricia M Fernandez; Jonathan L Brisman; Razvan Buciuc; Mark J Kupersmith; Alejandro Berenstein Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Samuel Pearce; Julian T Maingard; Hong Kuan Kok; Christen D Barras; Jeremy H Russell; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Ash Jhamb; Vincent Thijs; Mark Brooks; Hamed Asadi Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Pervinder Bhogal; Patrick A Brouwer; Åsa Kuntze Söderqvist; Marcus Ohlsson; Tommy Andersson; Staffan Holmin; Michael Söderman Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Pankajavalli Ramakrishnan; Albert J Yoo; James D Rabinov; Christopher S Ogilvy; Joshua A Hirsch; Raul G Nogueira Journal: Interv Neurol Date: 2013-10
Authors: Jean-Christophe Gentric; Joelle Brisson; André Lima Batista; Jimmy Ghostine; Jean Raymond; Daniel Roy; Alain Weill Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Ryan D Walsh; Kevin M Barrett; Maria I Aguilar; Giuseppe Lanzino; Ricardo A Hanel; David A Miller; Brian W Chong; W David Freeman Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jacques Sedat; Yves Chau; Lydiane Mondot; Richard Chemla; Michel Lonjon; Bernard Padovani Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 2.804