BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The management of thrombus formation during coil placement in an intracranial aneurysm is important in minimizing periprocedural morbidity and mortality. We report on seven cases in which the primary treatment for thrombus formation during such coil placement was intra-arterial abciximab infusion. METHODS: Clinical and radiologic records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent coil placement in intracranial aneurysms at our institution during a 1-year period were reviewed. We identified seven cases (four ruptured aneurysms, three unruptured aneurysms) in which thrombus formation occurred during the procedure. RESULTS: Intra-arterial abciximab infusion, up to 5 mg, completely dissolved the thrombus in four of seven patients and almost completely dissolved it in two. In one patient with distal emboli, recanalization was not achieved. In two patients, an intravenous bolus of abciximab without 12-hour infusion was also given adjunctively. In one patient, leakage of contrast material occurred; this was related to the intra-arterial infusion. Clinically, no new neurologic deficits were directly related to the intra-arterial abciximab infusion. Six patients had good clinical outcome, and one patient died. CONCLUSION: Relatively low-dose, intra-arterial abciximab infusion can immediately dissolve an acute thrombus that forms during intracranial aneurysm coil placement. Although neither the optimal dose of intra-arterial abciximab nor the need to supplement the intra-arterial infusion with intravenous administration was established, we preliminarily found that low-dose intra-arterial abciximab infusion may be relatively effective and safe in this setting, even in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The management of thrombus formation during coil placement in an intracranial aneurysm is important in minimizing periprocedural morbidity and mortality. We report on seven cases in which the primary treatment for thrombus formation during such coil placement was intra-arterial abciximab infusion. METHODS: Clinical and radiologic records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent coil placement in intracranial aneurysms at our institution during a 1-year period were reviewed. We identified seven cases (four ruptured aneurysms, three unruptured aneurysms) in which thrombus formation occurred during the procedure. RESULTS: Intra-arterial abciximab infusion, up to 5 mg, completely dissolved the thrombus in four of seven patients and almost completely dissolved it in two. In one patient with distal emboli, recanalization was not achieved. In two patients, an intravenous bolus of abciximab without 12-hour infusion was also given adjunctively. In one patient, leakage of contrast material occurred; this was related to the intra-arterial infusion. Clinically, no new neurologic deficits were directly related to the intra-arterial abciximab infusion. Six patients had good clinical outcome, and one patient died. CONCLUSION: Relatively low-dose, intra-arterial abciximab infusion can immediately dissolve an acute thrombus that forms during intracranial aneurysm coil placement. Although neither the optimal dose of intra-arterial abciximab nor the need to supplement the intra-arterial infusion with intravenous administration was established, we preliminarily found that low-dose intra-arterial abciximab infusion may be relatively effective and safe in this setting, even in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Authors: J J Ferguson; D J Kereiakes; A A Adgey; K A Fox; W B Hillegass; M Pfisterer; C Vassanelli Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: J S Gammie; M Zenati; R L Kormos; B G Hattler; L M Wei; R V Pellegrini; B P Griffith; C M Dyke Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Colin P Derdeyn; DeWitte T Cross; Christopher J Moran; George W Brown; Thomas K Pilgram; Michael N Diringer; Robert L Grubb; Keith M Rich; Michael R Chicoine; Ralph G Dacey Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Michael J Workman; Harry J Cloft; Frank C Tong; Jacques E Dion; Mary E Jensen; William F Marx; David F Kallmes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Ghaffari; D J Kereiakes; A M Lincoff; T A Kelly; G C Timmis; N S Kleiman; J J Ferguson; D P Miller; R A Califf; E J Topol Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1998-07-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jan Gralla; Adam T M Rennie; Rufus A Corkill; Shivendra T Lalloo; Andrew Molyneux; James V Byrne; Wilhem Kuker Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Jingjie Hu; Hassan Albadawi; Brian W Chong; Amy R Deipolyi; Rahul A Sheth; Ali Khademhosseini; Rahmi Oklu Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Samuel Pearce; Julian T Maingard; Hong Kuan Kok; Christen D Barras; Jeremy H Russell; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Ash Jhamb; Vincent Thijs; Mark Brooks; Hamed Asadi Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Mirja M Wirtz; Clemens M Schirmer; Oded Goren; Christian O Bohan; Shamsher Dalal; Gregory Weiner; Paul M Foreman; Christoph J Griessenauer Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: G B Bradac; M Bergui; G Stura; M Fontanella; D Daniele; L Gozzoli; M Berardino; A Ducati Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: R Bruening; S Mueller-Schunk; D Morhard; K C Seelos; H Brueckmann; R Schmid-Elsaesser; A Straube; T E Mayer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jacques Sedat; Yves Chau; Lydiane Mondot; Richard Chemla; Michel Lonjon; Bernard Padovani Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Jin Sue Jeon; Seung Hun Sheen; Gyojun Hwang; Suk Hyung Kang; Dong Hwa Heo; Yong Jun Cho Journal: J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg Date: 2012-03-31