Literature DB >> 1878335

Double-blind, randomized comparative study of the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine slow-release and nifedipine slow-release in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease.

F K Maetzel1, W E Teufel, A Griebel, M H Glocke.   

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to investigate whether a new slow-release formation of nicardipine can control hypertension and whether its antihypertensive effect is manifest throughout the dose intervals. In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study, the antihypertensive effect of two calcium antagonists (Type II) was investigated in two independent groups of hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease. One group of patients received 40 mg nicardipine slow-release b.i.d. and the other 20 mg nifedipine slow-release b.i.d. The effect of the active drugs on blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and hemodynamics was compared with placebo within each group. In addition, a group comparison was made to establish whether nicardipine had any advantage over nifedipine. Twenty-eight patients [27 female, 1 male; 55 (41-72) years old], 18 with previous myocardial infarction (MI) entered the study (nicardipine, 15 patients; nifedipine, 13 patients). A placebo period of 3 days was followed by a 13-day drug treatment period. From the first to last trial day, BP and heart rate were measured three times daily. At the end of the placebo and the active drug periods, the following measurements were carried out: ambulatory BP monitoring by half-hourly recording for 12.5 hours with the Remler system, ergometric tests with ECG, and right heart catheterization. Both drugs lowered the BP at rest, during exercise, and during usual daily activities. The antihypertensive effect of nicardipine was significant for the daytime mean arterial BP (MAP) and for systolic BP and diastolic BP at various stages of the exercise tests. The difference between the effect of nicardipine and nifedipine was not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1878335     DOI: 10.1007/bf03029734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  30 in total

1.  The Remler ambulatory blood pressure recording system: Accuracy and reliability.

Authors:  R Cowan; M Sokolow; D Perloff
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1980-06

2.  Unpredictability of blood pressures recorded outside the clinic in the treated hypertensive patient.

Authors:  M Porchet; J P Bussien; B Waeber; J Nussberger; H R Brunner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to improve the accuracy and reduce the numbers of subjects in clinical trials of antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  J Conway; J Johnston; A Coats; V Somers; P Sleight
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Evaluation of the Remler M2000 blood pressure recorder. Comparison with intraarterial blood pressure recordings both at hospital and at home.

Authors:  B A Gould; R S Hornung; H A Kieso; D G Altman; P M Cashman; E B Raftery
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Acute haemodynamic effects of a new calcium antagonist, nicardipine, in man. A comparison with nifedipine.

Authors:  A Iliopoulou; P Turner; S J Warrington
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Ambulatory monitoring of arterial blood pressure. Comparison between blood pressure measurements obtained with the Remler M 2000 portable recorder and by radiotelemetry under laboratory conditions and during everyday activities.

Authors:  K Bachmann; G Bäuerlein
Journal:  Biotelem Patient Monit       Date:  1981

7.  Accuracy and reliability of two indirect ambulatory blood pressure recorders: Remler M2000 and Cardiodyne Sphygmolog.

Authors:  D J Fitzgerald; W G O'Callaghan; R McQuaid; K O'Malley; E O'Brien
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1982-12

8.  Side effects of hypotensive agents evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; C T Dollery
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-09-01

Review 9.  Nicardipine, nitrendipine, and bepridil: new calcium antagonists for cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  G R Hasegawa
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1988-02

Review 10.  Nonresponsiveness to antianginal therapy--a frequent problem?

Authors:  W Schulz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.