Literature DB >> 3154697

Nonresponsiveness to antianginal therapy--a frequent problem?

W Schulz1.   

Abstract

Nonresponsiveness to anginal treatment varies greatly and may be due to either the pathophysiology of the patients or the special pharmacology of different antianginal drugs. Therefore, individualized therapy, taking all aspects of patient and drug into account to improve responsiveness, seems desirable. Patients may vary--thus influencing the outcome of antianginal therapy--with respect to the severity of the disease, vasospastic components, and the pattern of organic vessel involvement. Drugs differ with respect to the ease of dose-finding, tolerance, the extent of spasmolytic activity, side effects, and paradoxical effects. In no patient with coronary artery disease is the outcome to treatment predictable, even if a full diagnostic evaluation of the patient has been performed. For example, the individual relevance of angiographically documented vasospastic components in patients with underlying organic multivessel disease can hardly be predicted, and therefore the appropriate choice of an antianginal drug is difficult. In addition, a full invasive evaluation of all coronary patients, only to find arguments for the optimal drug therapy, is not feasible. Therefore, the empiric approach is recommended for daily routine. Drugs are preferred that usually provide a high response rate and the smallest cause for concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3154697     DOI: 10.1007/bf00054255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  25 in total

1.  Long-acting coronary vasodilatory action of the molsidomine metabolite Sin 1: a quantitative angiographic study.

Authors:  P W Serruys; J W Deckers; H E Luijten; J H Reiber; J G Tijssen; D Chadha; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  [Continuing anti-anginal effectiveness during chronic nitrate therapy in spite of the cessation of hemodynamic partial effects].

Authors:  M Kaltenbach; W Schneider
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1986-03-07       Impact factor: 0.628

3.  [Treatment of stress-induced angina pectoris and chronic heart failure with molsidomine].

Authors:  A Beyerle; W Rudolph
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1986-01-31

4.  Efficacy of nifedipine therapy in patients with refractory angina pectoris: significance of the presence of coronary vasospasm.

Authors:  P H Stone; J E Muller; Z G Turi; E Geltman; A S Jaffe; E Braunwald
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Active and passive changes in coronary diameter after vasodilation with SIN-1, the active metabolite of molsidomine.

Authors:  W Schulz; G Kober; R Bernauer; M Kaltenbach
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Mechanism of action of verapamil in ischemic heart disease: observations on changes in systemic and coronary hemodynamics and coronary vasomobility.

Authors:  C Y Chew; B G Brown; B N Singh; H S Hecht; S J Schnugg; M Wong; P M Shah; H T Dodge
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 0.825

7.  [Dynamics of critical stenosis in patients with unstable angina pectoris].

Authors:  K R Karsch; P Niemczyk; W Voelker; L Seipel
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1984-09

8.  The new long-acting coronary artery dilator molsidomine and its metabolite SIN-1.

Authors:  J Sobolski; P Vandermoten; E Stoupel; G Berkenboom; S Degre
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Objective evaluation of three dose levels of diltiazem in patients with chronic stable angina.

Authors:  V Bala Subramanian; N S Khurmi; M J Bowles; M O'Hara; E B Raftery
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Detrimental effect of propranolol in patients with coronary arterial spasm countered by combination with diltiazem.

Authors:  P Y Tilmant; J M Lablanche; F A Thieuleux; B A Dupuis; M E Bertrand
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Double-blind, randomized comparative study of the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine slow-release and nifedipine slow-release in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  F K Maetzel; W E Teufel; A Griebel; M H Glocke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.