Literature DB >> 18782733

Elevated levels of expression associated with regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.

Penelope R Haddrill1, Fergal M Waldron, Brian Charlesworth.   

Abstract

The recombinational environment influences patterns of molecular evolution through the effects of Hill-Robertson interference. Here, we examine genome-wide patterns of gene expression with respect to recombinational environment in Drosophila melanogaster. We find that regions of the genome lacking crossing over exhibit elevated levels of expression, and this is most pronounced for genes on the entirely non-crossing over fourth chromosome. We find no evidence for differences in the patterns of gene expression between regions of high, intermediate and low crossover frequencies. These results suggest that, in the absence of crossing over, selection to maintain control of expression may be compromised, perhaps due to the accumulation of deleterious mutations in regulatory regions. Alternatively, higher gene expression may be evolving to compensate for defective protein products or reduced translational efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18782733      PMCID: PMC2614156          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences.

Authors:  C M Bergman; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The problem of counting sites in the estimation of the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates: implications for the correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.

Authors:  G Marais; D Mouchiroud; L Duret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.

Authors:  C H Langley; B P Lazzaro; W Phillips; E Heikkinen; J M Braverman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The evolutionary advantage of recombination.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrea J Betancourt; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Patterns of genetic variation at a chromosome 4 locus of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  Mark A Jensen; Brian Charlesworth; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Painting of fourth in genus Drosophila suggests autosome-specific gene regulation.

Authors:  Jan Larsson; Malin J Svensson; Per Stenberg; Maria Mäkitalo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genomic degradation of a young Y chromosome in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Emily Hom; Karen M Wong; Xulio Maside; Pieter de Jong
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  10 in total

1.  Intronic AT skew is a defendable proxy for germline transcription but does not predict crossing-over or protein evolution rates in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Claudia C Weber; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Protein rates of evolution are predicted by double-strand break events, independent of crossing-over rates.

Authors:  Claudia C Weber; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  HP1a recruitment to promoters is independent of H3K9 methylation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Margarida L A Figueiredo; Philge Philip; Per Stenberg; Jan Larsson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 4.  Buffering and the evolution of chromosome-wide gene regulation.

Authors:  Per Stenberg; Jan Larsson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Modulation of RNA stability regulates gene expression in two opposite ways: through buffering of RNA levels upon global perturbations and by supporting adapted differential expression.

Authors:  Marie-Line Faucillion; Anna-Mia Johansson; Jan Larsson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 19.160

6.  Recombination modulates how selection affects linked sites in Drosophila.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Caiti S S Heil; Brenda Manzano-Winkler; Laurence Loewe; Steve Goldstein; Tiffany L Himmel; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Complete chloroplast genome sequence of holoparasite Cistanche deserticola (Orobanchaceae) reveals gene loss and horizontal gene transfer from its host Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae).

Authors:  Xi Li; Ti-Cao Zhang; Qin Qiao; Zhumei Ren; Jiayuan Zhao; Takahiro Yonezawa; Masami Hasegawa; M James C Crabbe; Jianqiang Li; Yang Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  HP1a, Su(var)3-9, SETDB1 and POF stimulate or repress gene expression depending on genomic position, gene length and expression pattern in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lina E Lundberg; Per Stenberg; Jan Larsson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Molecular evolution in nonrecombining regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  José L Campos; Brian Charlesworth; Penelope R Haddrill
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  The X-linked 1.688 Satellite in Drosophila melanogaster Promotes Specific Targeting by Painting of Fourth.

Authors:  Maria Kim; Samaneh Ekhteraei-Tousi; Jacob Lewerentz; Jan Larsson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.