Literature DB >> 18780883

The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome.

Si-Woon Park1, Steven L Wolf, Sarah Blanton, Carolee Winstein, Deborah S Nichols-Larsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: This study determined which baseline clinical measurements best predicted a predefined clinically meaningful outcome on the Motor Activity Log (MAL) and developed a predictive multivariate model to determine outcome after 2 weeks of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and 12 months later using the database from participants in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial.
METHODS: A clinically meaningful CIMT outcome was defined as achieving higher than 3 on the MAL Quality of Movement (QOM) scale. Predictive variables included baseline MAL, Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), the sensory and motor portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), spasticity, visual perception, age, gender, type of stroke, concordance, and time after stroke. Significant predictors identified by univariate analysis were used to develop the multivariate model. Predictive equations were generated and odds ratios for predictors were calculated from the multivariate model.
RESULTS: Pretreatment motor function measured by MAL QOM, WMFT, and FMA were significantly associated with outcome immediately after CIMT. Pretreatment MAL QOM, WMFT, proprioception, and age were significantly associated with outcome after 12 months. Each unit of higher pretreatment MAL QOM score and each unit of faster pretreatment WMFT log mean time improved the probability of achieving a clinically meaningful outcome by 7 and 3 times at posttreatment, and 5 and 2 times after 12 months, respectively. Patients with impaired proprioception had a 20% probability of achieving a clinically meaningful outcome compared with those with intact proprioception.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline clinical measures of motor and sensory function can be used to predict a clinically meaningful outcome after CIMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18780883      PMCID: PMC3754439          DOI: 10.1177/1545968308316906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  19 in total

1.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J H van der Lee; R C Wagenaar; G J Lankhorst; T W Vogelaar; W L Devillé; L M Bouter
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review.

Authors:  E Taub; G Uswatte; R Pidikiti
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1999-07

3.  Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke.

Authors:  Stacy L Fritz; Kathye E Light; Tara S Patterson; Andrea L Behrman; Sandra B Davis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Application of the CIT concept in the clinical environment: hurdles, practicalities, and clinical benefits.

Authors:  Annette Sterr; Andre Szameitat; Shan Shen; Susanna Freivogel
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques.

Authors:  T P Pons; P E Garraghty; A K Ommaya; J H Kaas; E Taub; M Mishkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke.

Authors:  G Uswatte; E Taub; D Morris; K Light; P A Thompson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Carolee J Winstein; J Philip Miller; Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; David Morris; Carol Giuliani; Kathye E Light; Deborah Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM)

Authors:  B B Hamilton; J A Laughlin; R C Fiedler; C V Granger
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1994-09

9.  Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures.

Authors:  C V Granger; L S Dewis; N C Peters; C C Sherwood; J E Barrett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  CI therapy distribution: theory, evidence and practice.

Authors:  Annette Sterr; Amy Saunders
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.138

View more
  25 in total

1.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Dose-Matched Interventions for Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Stroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ted Stevenson; Leyda Thalman; Heather Christie; William Poluha
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial.

Authors:  Shuya Chen; Steven L Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul A Thompson; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  The effect of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on spasticity and motor function of the affected arm in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  A Siebers; U Oberg; E Skargren
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 4.  The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Anticipatory planning of functional reach-to-grasp: a pilot study.

Authors:  Caroline Tan; Jarugool Tretriluxana; Erica Pitsch; Nuttakarn Runnarong; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  The "good" limb makes the "bad" limb worse: experience-dependent interhemispheric disruption of functional outcome after cortical infarcts in rats.

Authors:  Rachel P Allred; Colleen H Cappellini; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Effects of Somatosensory Impairment on Participation After Stroke.

Authors:  Leeanne M Carey; Thomas A Matyas; Carolyn Baum
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2018 May/Jun

8.  Randomized controlled trial of surface peroneal nerve stimulation for motor relearning in lower limb hemiparesis.

Authors:  Lynne R Sheffler; Paul N Taylor; Douglas D Gunzler; Jaap H Buurke; Maarten J Ijzerman; John Chae
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Sensorimotor training and neural reorganization after stroke: a case series.

Authors:  Alexandra L Borstad; Travis Bird; Seongjin Choi; Lindsay Goodman; Petra Schmalbrock; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Post-stroke protection from maladaptive effects of learning with the non-paretic forelimb by bimanual home cage experience in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Abigail L Kerr; Malerie L Wolke; Jared A Bell; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.