Literature DB >> 16633019

Application of the CIT concept in the clinical environment: hurdles, practicalities, and clinical benefits.

Annette Sterr1, Andre Szameitat, Shan Shen, Susanna Freivogel.   

Abstract

Basic neuroscience research on brain plasticity, motor learning, and recovery has stimulated new concepts in motor rehabilitation. Combined with the development of methodological goal standards in clinical outcome research, these findings have effectuated the introduction of a double-paradigm shift in physical rehabilitation: (a) the move toward evidence-based procedures and disablement models for the assessment of clinical outcome and (b) the introduction of training-based concepts that are theoretically founded in learning theory. A major drive for new interventions has further come from recent findings on the adaptive capacities of neural networks and their linkage to perception, performance, and long-term recovery. In this context, constraint-induced movement therapy, an intervention initially designed for upper-limb hemiparesis, represents the theoretically and empirically most thoroughly founded training concept. Several clinical trials on constraint-induced therapy (CIT) have shown its efficacy in higher functioning patients; however, the transfer of the treatment into standard health care seems slow. Survey research further suggests a rather poor acceptance of CIT among clinical staff and it seems that the implementation of CIT is hindered by barriers constructed of beliefs and assumptions that demand a critical and evidence-based discussion. Within this context, we have conducted a series of experiments on amended CIT protocols and their application in the clinical environment which addressed the following issues: (1) massed practice: are 6 hours of daily training inevitable to achieve clinical benefits? (2) practicality: what is feasible in the standard care setting and what are the clinical benefits achieved by "feasible compromise CIT protocols?" (3) apprehensions: are concerns on increased muscular tone and pathologic movement patterns justified, and (4) learned nonuse: is the assumption of "hidden" residual abilities valid so that it warrants the constraint condition? In the present paper, the key findings of these studies will be summarized and critically discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633019     DOI: 10.1097/00146965-200603000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol        ISSN: 1543-3633            Impact factor:   1.600


  9 in total

1.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Dose-Matched Interventions for Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Stroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ted Stevenson; Leyda Thalman; Heather Christie; William Poluha
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for severe upper-extremity impairment after stroke in an outpatient rehabilitation setting: a case report.

Authors:  Michelle Ploughman; Jennifer Shears; Lisa Hutchings; Michelle Osmond
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Examining the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in canadian neurological occupational and physical therapy.

Authors:  Alana Fleet; Marion Che; Marilyn Mackay-Lyons; Diane Mackenzie; Stephen Page; Gail Eskes; Alison McDonald; Joy Boyce; Shaun Boe
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome.

Authors:  Si-Woon Park; Steven L Wolf; Sarah Blanton; Carolee Winstein; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  A case to be made: theoretical and empirical arguments for the need to consider fatigue in post-stroke motor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Annette Sterr; Leonardo Furlan
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 6.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design.

Authors:  Annick A A Timmermans; Henk A M Seelen; Richard D Willmann; Herman Kingma
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 7.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in people with stroke.

Authors:  Davide Corbetta; Valeria Sirtori; Greta Castellini; Lorenzo Moja; Roberto Gatti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-08

8.  Motor planning in chronic upper-limb hemiparesis: evidence from movement-related potentials.

Authors:  Philip John Ainsley Dean; Ellen Seiss; Annette Sterr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cortical reorganization after hand immobilization: the beta qEEG spectral coherence evidences.

Authors:  Marina Fortuna; Silmar Teixeira; Sérgio Machado; Bruna Velasques; Juliana Bittencourt; Caroline Peressutti; Henning Budde; Mauricio Cagy; Antonio E Nardi; Roberto Piedade; Pedro Ribeiro; Oscar Arias-Carrión
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.