Literature DB >> 15890987

Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke.

Stacy L Fritz1, Kathye E Light, Tara S Patterson, Andrea L Behrman, Sandra B Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a rehabilitative strategy used primarily with the post-stroke population to increase the functional use of the neurologically weaker upper extremity through massed practice while restraining the lesser involved upper extremity. Whereas research evidence supports CIMT, limited evidence exists regarding the characteristics of individuals who benefit most from this intervention. The goal of this study was to investigate the potential of 5 measures to predict functional CIMT outcomes.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 55 individuals, >6 months after stroke, was recruited that met specific inclusion/exclusion criteria allowing for individuals whose upper extremity was mildly to severely involved. They participated in CIMT 6 hours per day. Pretest, post-test, and follow-up assessments were performed to assess the outcomes for the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The potential predictors were minimal motor criteria (active extension of the wrist and 3 fingers), active finger extension/grasp release, grip strength, Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor score, and the Frenchay score. A step-wise regression analysis was used in which the potential predictors were entered in a linear regression model with simultaneous entry of the dependent variables' pretest score as the covariate. Two regressions models were determined for the dependent variable, for immediate post-test, and for follow-up post-test.
RESULTS: Finger extension was the only significant predictor of WMFT outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: When using finger extension/grasp release as a predictor in the regression equations, one can predict individual's follow-up scores for CIMT. This experiment provides the most comprehensive investigation of predictors of CIMT outcomes to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15890987     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000165922.96430.d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  33 in total

1.  A novel device to measure power grip forces in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Scott D Bury; Erik J Plautz; Wen Liu; Barbara M Quaney; Carl W Luchies; Rebecca A Maletsky; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Imaging motor recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Nuray Yozbatiran; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

3.  Constraint-induced movement therapy to improve paretic upper-extremity motor skills and function of a patient in the subacute stage of stroke.

Authors:  Saleh M Aloraini; Marilyn Mackay-Lyons; Shaun Boe; Alison McDonald
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Impact of Targeted Assistance of Multiarticular Finger Musculotendons on the Coordination of Finger Muscles During Isometric Force Production.

Authors:  Sang Wook Lee; Billy C Vermillion; Shashwati Geed; Alexander W Dromerick; Derek G Kamper
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Measurement structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: implications for motor control theory.

Authors:  Michelle Woodbury; Craig A Velozo; Paul A Thompson; Kathye Light; Gitendra Uswatte; Edward Taub; Carolee J Winstein; David Morris; Sarah Blanton; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome.

Authors:  Si-Woon Park; Steven L Wolf; Sarah Blanton; Carolee Winstein; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be streamlined?

Authors:  Kimberly Bogard; Steven Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul Thompson; David Morris; Deborah Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Carolee J Winstein; J Phillip Miller; Paul A Thompson; Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; David Morris; Sarah Blanton; Deborah Nichols-Larsen; Patricia C Clark
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Recovery of thumb and finger extension and its relation to grasp performance after stroke.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Stacey L DeJong; Justin A Beebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ULTRA-stroke program design.

Authors:  A Lex E Q van Delden; C Lieke E Peper; Jaap Harlaar; Andreas Daffertshofer; Nienke I Zijp; Kirsten Nienhuys; Peter Koppe; Gert Kwakkel; Peter J Beek
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.