Literature DB >> 18780338

Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors : a population-based analysis.

Gregory S Cooper1, Tzuyung Doug Kou, Harry L Reynolds.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After curative resection for colorectal cancer, routine follow-up with office visits, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and colonoscopy is recommended. The actual adherence to these guidelines as well as the potential overuse of testing in routine practice has not been well studied.
METHODS: The authors identified 9426 eligible patients aged > or = 66 years in a linked tumor registry-claims database who were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum from 2000 to 2001. Patients were observed to 3 years after diagnosis. Receipt of > or = 2 office visits per year, > or = 2 CEA tests per year (years 1 and 2), and > or = 1 colonoscopy within 3 years constituted guideline fulfillment.
RESULTS: Guidelines for office visits, colonoscopy, and CEA testing were met in 92.3%, 73.6%, and 46.7% of patients, respectively. In addition, receipt of 2 nonrecommended procedures, abdominal/pelvic computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography scans, was documented in 47.7% and 6.8%, respectively. Overall, 60.2% received testing below recommended levels, 17.1% at recommended frequency, and 22.7% above guideline recommendations. In a multivariate analysis, factors associated with meeting guidelines included younger age group, white race, regional stage cancers, and poorly differentiated tumors. Considerable geographic variation in meeting guidelines was also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Many older colorectal cancer survivors in this population-based cohort underwent testing below a minimum frequency specified by clinical practice guidelines, especially with regard to CEA. Further studies should ascertain the reasons for poor compliance and the effect on patient outcome. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18780338     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  48 in total

1.  Associations of physician supplies with colon cancer care in Ontario and California, 1996 to 2006.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Karen Y Fung; Eric J Holowaty; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Madhan K Balagurusamy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Challenges in the management of older patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  Efrat Dotan; Ilene Browner; Arti Hurria; Crystal Denlinger
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Estimating the cost related to surveillance of colorectal cancer in a French population.

Authors:  Catherine Lejeune; Christine Binquet; Franck Bonnetain; Amel Mahboubi; Michal Abrahamowicz; Thierry Moreau; Maria Raikou; Laurent Bedenne; Catherine Quantin; Claire Bonithon-Kopp
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-03-04

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Provider perceptions and expectations of breast cancer posttreatment care: a University of California Athena Breast Health Network project.

Authors:  Erin E Hahn; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle E Melisko; John P Pierce; Marlene von Friederichs-Fitzwater; Karen T Lane; Robert A Hiatt
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Surveillance Practice Patterns after Curative Intent Therapy for Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Christopher T Erb; Kevin W Su; Pamela R Soulos; Lynn T Tanoue; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Graham A Colditz; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines.

Authors:  Amanpal Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.