Literature DB >> 18779948

Is a femoral component applicator useful in total knee replacement?

Adnan A Faraj1, Prashant Boda.   

Abstract

The benefit of using an applicator to insert the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty in preventing flexion of the femoral component in the sagittal angle was evaluated in a prospective, consecutive, single-surgeon series. In group I (60 knee replacements) the applicator was used. In group II (64 knees) the femoral component was implanted without an applicator. In all these cases, the femoral cuts were precisely done using cutting blocks. Postoperative X-rays were studied to evaluate the flexion angle of the femoral component in the sagittal plane. Alpha, beta and peg angles of the two groups were compared. It was found that in the group where the applicator was used, there were a slightly higher proportion of patients with values lying within the mean values (two-tailed P value of 0.0009). Our study statistically confirmed that the use of an applicator during femoral component insertion does significantly decrease the incidence of tilt of the femoral component in the sagittal angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18779948     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0621-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  6 in total

1.  Effect of femoral component designs on the contact and tracking characteristics of the unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Tanzer; C A McLean; E Laxer; J Casey; A M Ahmed
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?

Authors:  S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William M Mihalko; James Boyle; Lindsey D Clark; Kenneth A Krackow
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Ensini; F Catani; A Leardini; M Romagnoli; S Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Doerte Krocker; Ulrike Weiss; Stephan Tohtz; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Effect of rotational malposition of the femoral component on knee stability kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Nagamine; S E White; D S McCarthy; L A Whiteside
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.