Literature DB >> 18775821

Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs. An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP).

Torsten Lauritzen1, Morten Sig Ager Jensen, Janus Laust Thomsen, Bo Christensen, Marianne Engberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few randomized controlled trials (RCT) have evaluated health tests and health consultations in primary care with a long follow-up period. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP) evaluated health tests and health consultations over a period of 5 years in the frame of a health technology assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To review the results of EHPP.
DESIGN: RCT with a control group answering questionnaires and two intervention groups having questionnaires, a comprehensive health test with written advice followed by either a normal consultation on demand or a planned 45 minutes patient-centred consultation.
SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: The target population was all 30-49 year old persons in the municipality of Ebeltoft, Denmark. Invitations were received by 2000 randomly selected persons. INTERVENTION: A comprehensive biomedical health test including a cardiovascular risk score (CVRS) followed by written advice and health consultations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Biomedical measures, psychological measures, healthcare contacts, life years gained, direct and total health costs.
RESULTS: At baseline 75% participated. During the 5 years 85% participated at least once. Elevated CVRS was found in 19% in the control group compared to 10% in the intervention groups (p<0.01) after 5 years. There were no measurable long term psychological reactions. Numbers of contacts to the healthcare system were not increased. Significantly better life expectancy was found without extra direct and total costs.
CONCLUSIONS: An offer of health tests and patient-centred health consultations to the middle-aged population can be cost-effective and may be considered in the fight against the increasing burden of lifestyle diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18775821     DOI: 10.1177/1403494807090165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  15 in total

1.  HbA1c and cardiovascular risk score identify people who may benefit from preventive interventions: a 7 year follow-up of a high-risk screening programme for diabetes in primary care (ADDITION), Denmark.

Authors:  T Lauritzen; A Sandbaek; M V Skriver; K Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kunal N Karmali; Stephen D Persell; Pablo Perel; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-14

3.  The Västerbotten Intervention Programme: background, design and implications.

Authors:  Margareta Norberg; Stig Wall; Kurt Boman; Lars Weinehall
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 4.  Screening with urinary dipsticks for reducing morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Lasse T Krogsbøll; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  Diversity and ambivalence in general practitioners' attitudes towards preventive health checks - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne Søndergaard; Bo Christensen; Helle Terkildsen Maindal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.

Authors:  Lasse T Krogsbøll; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-31

7.  A health dialogue intervention reduces cardiovascular risk factor levels: a population based randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary care setting with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mats Hellstrand; Bo Simonsson; Sevek Engström; Kent W Nilsson; Anu Molarius
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Systematic versus opportunistic risk assessment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mariana Dyakova; Saran Shantikumar; Jill L Colquitt; Christian M Drew; Morag Sime; Joanna MacIver; Nicola Wright; Aileen Clarke; Karen Rees
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

9.  Effectiveness of the population-based Check your health preventive programme conducted in primary care with 4 years follow-up [the CORE trial]: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helle Terkildsen Maindal; Henrik Støvring; Annelli Sandbaek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kirsten Høj; Mette Vinther Skriver; Anne-Louise Smidt Hansen; Bo Christensen; Helle Terkildsen Maindal; Annelli Sandbæk
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.