Literature DB >> 18772535

[Signal-to-noise ratio measurement in parallel MRI with subtraction mapping and consecutive methods].

Hiroshi Imai1, Tosiaki Miyati, Akio Ogura, Tsukasa Doi, Toshio Tsuchihashi, Yoshio Machida, Masato Kobayashi, Kouzou Shimizu, Yoshihiro Kitou.   

Abstract

When measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an image the used parallel magnetic resonance imaging, it was confirmed that there was a problem in the application of past SNR measurement. With the method of measuring the noise from the background signal, SNR with parallel imaging was higher than that without parallel imaging. In the subtraction method (NEMA standard), which sets a wide region of interest, the white noise was not evaluated correctly although SNR was close to the theoretical value. We proposed two techniques because SNR in parallel imaging was not uniform according to inhomogeneity of the coil sensitivity distribution and geometry factor. Using the first method (subtraction mapping), two images were scanned with identical parameters. The SNR in each pixel divided the running mean (7 by 7 pixels in neighborhood) by standard deviation/radical2 in the same region of interest. Using the second (consecutive) method, more than fifty consecutive scans of the uniform phantom were obtained with identical scan parameters. Then the SNR was calculated from the ratio of mean signal intensity to the standard deviation in each pixel on a series of images. Moreover, geometry factors were calculated from SNRs with and without parallel imaging. The SNR and geometry factor using parallel imaging in the subtraction mapping method agreed with those of the consecutive method. Both methods make it possible to obtain a more detailed determination of SNR in parallel imaging and to calculate the geometry factor.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18772535     DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.64.930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi        ISSN: 0369-4305


  4 in total

1.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI.

Authors:  Frank L Goerner; Geoffrey D Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effect of hepatobiliary uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatic venous phase of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging on a 3.0-T apparatus: comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.

Authors:  Yasunari Fujinaga; Ayumi Ohya; Tsuyoshi Matsushita; Masahiro Kurozumi; Kazuhiko Ueda; Yoshihiro Kitou; Hitoshi Ueda; Masumi Kadoya
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of commercially available phased array coils in 3.0 T brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tsukasa Yoshida; Kensei Shirata; Atsushi Urikura; Michitoshi Ito; Yoshihiro Nakaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-05-26

4.  DTI parameter optimisation for acquisition at 1.5T: SNR analysis and clinical application.

Authors:  M Laganà; M Rovaris; A Ceccarelli; C Venturelli; S Marini; G Baselli
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.