Literature DB >> 24631981

The effects of age and workload on 3D spatial attention in dual-task driving.

Russell S Pierce1, George J Andersen2.   

Abstract

In the present study we assessed whether the limits in visual-spatial attention associated with aging affect the spatial extent of attention in depth during driving performance. Drivers in the present study performed a car-following and light-detection task. To assess the extent of visual-spatial attention, we compared reaction times and accuracy to light change targets that varied in horizontal position and depth location. In addition, because workload has been identified as a factor that can change the horizontal and vertical extent of attention, we tested whether variability of the lead car speed influenced the extent of spatial attention for younger or older drivers. For younger drivers, reaction time (RT) to light-change targets varied as a function of distance and horizontal position. For older drivers RT varied only as a function of distance. There was a distance by horizontal position interaction for younger drivers but not for older drivers. Specifically, there was no effect of horizontal position at any given level of depth for older drivers. However, for younger drivers there was an effect of horizontal position for targets further in depth but not for targets nearer in depth. With regards to workload, we found no statistically reliable evidence that variability of the lead car speed had an effect on the spatial extent of attention for younger or older drivers. In a control experiment, we examined the effects of depth on light detection when the projected size and position of the targets was constant. Consistent with our previous results, we found that drivers' reaction time to light-change targets varied as a function of distance even when 2D position and size were controlled. Given that depth is an important dimension in driving performance, an important issue for assessing driving safety is to consider the limits of attention in the depth dimension. Therefore, we suggest that future research should consider the importance of depth as a dimension of spatial attention in relation to the assessment of driving performance.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D attention; Aging; Attention; UFOV; Visual attention; Workload

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631981      PMCID: PMC3995863          DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  36 in total

1.  Age-related changes in the control of attention in depth.

Authors:  P Atchley; A F Kramer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-03

2.  Exploratory study of incident vehicle crashes among older drivers.

Authors:  R V Sims; G McGwin; R M Allman; K Ball; C Owsley
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: on-road versus simulated driving.

Authors:  Hoe C Lee; Don Cameron; Andy H Lee
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Conversation limits the functional field of view.

Authors:  Paul Atchley; Jeff Dressel
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons.

Authors:  Brian R Cavoto; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-07

6.  Visual localization: age and practice.

Authors:  R Sekuler; K Ball
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important.

Authors:  L J Williams
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1988

8.  Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field.

Authors:  A F Sanders
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  The advantage of a ground surface in the representation of visual scenes.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Monotonous driving induces shifts in spatial attention as a function of handedness.

Authors:  D Chandrakumar; S Coussens; H A D Keage; S Banks; J Dorrian; T Loetscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Driver's Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign Information Exposure in Complex Environments: A Case Study of the Highways in China.

Authors:  Nengchao Lyu; Lian Xie; Chaozhong Wu; Qiang Fu; Chao Deng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Identifying the Causes of Drivers' Hazardous States Using Driver Characteristics, Vehicle Kinematics, and Physiological Measurements.

Authors:  Ali Darzi; Sherif M Gaweesh; Mohamed M Ahmed; Domen Novak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.