Charlotta Johansson1, Bertil Lindblom. 1. Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden. charlotta.johansson@vgregion.se
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyse retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness in eyes with compression of the optic chiasm by a pituitary adenoma. RNFL thickness was analysed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and compared to visual field measurements using high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP). METHODS: Sixteen eyes from eight patients with pituitary adenoma were studied. All had bitemporal visual field depression caused by compression of the optic chiasm. Patients were submitted to an ophthalmic examination more than 14 months after surgery (seven patients had undergone trans-sphenoidal and one trans-cranial adenomectomy). The examination included HRP, fundus photography and measurement of the peripapillar RNFL thickness using OCT. RESULTS: In spite of temporal visual field depression, not all eyes showed reduced RNFL thickness by OCT. This was also true for some eyes in which RNFL was judged to be reduced on fundus photographs. Contrary to our expectations, RNFL thickness in the nasal quadrant was normal in nine of the 16 eyes. Corresponding figures for the superior, inferior and temporal quadrants were eight, six and five, respectively. The overall RNFL thickness, as measured by OCT, did not correlate well with neural capacity, which is an index of remaining retino-cortical neural channels in HRP. CONCLUSION: RNFL thickness as measured with OCT was reduced in most, but not all, eyes with temporal field depression caused by chiasmal compression. The pattern of RNFL loss did not correlate well with the visual field defect. Sensitivity of RNFL thickness measurement in OCT was low. The method has limited value in the diagnosis of pituitary tumour compression.
PURPOSE: To analyse retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness in eyes with compression of the optic chiasm by a pituitary adenoma. RNFL thickness was analysed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and compared to visual field measurements using high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP). METHODS: Sixteen eyes from eight patients with pituitary adenoma were studied. All had bitemporal visual field depression caused by compression of the optic chiasm. Patients were submitted to an ophthalmic examination more than 14 months after surgery (seven patients had undergone trans-sphenoidal and one trans-cranial adenomectomy). The examination included HRP, fundus photography and measurement of the peripapillar RNFL thickness using OCT. RESULTS: In spite of temporal visual field depression, not all eyes showed reduced RNFL thickness by OCT. This was also true for some eyes in which RNFL was judged to be reduced on fundus photographs. Contrary to our expectations, RNFL thickness in the nasal quadrant was normal in nine of the 16 eyes. Corresponding figures for the superior, inferior and temporal quadrants were eight, six and five, respectively. The overall RNFL thickness, as measured by OCT, did not correlate well with neural capacity, which is an index of remaining retino-cortical neural channels in HRP. CONCLUSION: RNFL thickness as measured with OCT was reduced in most, but not all, eyes with temporal field depression caused by chiasmal compression. The pattern of RNFL loss did not correlate well with the visual field defect. Sensitivity of RNFL thickness measurement in OCT was low. The method has limited value in the diagnosis of pituitary tumour compression.
Authors: Evelyn C O'Neill; Helen V Danesh-Meyer; Paul P Connell; Ian A Trounce; Michael A Coote; David A Mackey; Jonathan G Crowston Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: G Cennamo; R S Auriemma; D Cardone; L F S Grasso; N Velotti; C Simeoli; C Di Somma; R Pivonello; A Colao; G de Crecchio Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: John W Rutland; Bradley N Delman; Kuang-Han Huang; Gaurav Verma; Noah C Benson; Dillan F Villavisanis; Hung-Mo Lin; Joshua B Bederson; James Chelnis; Raj K Shrivastava; Priti Balchandani Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 5.115