John W Rutland1,2, Bradley N Delman1,3, Kuang-Han Huang1, Gaurav Verma1, Noah C Benson4, Dillan F Villavisanis1, Hung-Mo Lin5, Joshua B Bederson2, James Chelnis6, Raj K Shrivastava2, Priti Balchandani1. 1. 1Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. 2. 2Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. 3. 3Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. 4. 4Department of Psychology, New York University. 5. 5Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Mount Sinai Hospital; and. 6. 6Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vision loss remains a debilitating complication of pituitary adenomas, although there is considerable variability in visual impairment before and after decompression surgery. Growing evidence suggests secondary damage to remote visual structures may contribute to vision loss in patients with chiasmatic compression. The present study leverages ultrahigh field 7-T MRI to study the retinotopic organization of the primary visual cortex (V1), and correlates visual defects with cortical thinning in V1 to characterize consequences of pituitary adenomas on the posterior visual system. METHODS: Eight patients (4 males and 4 females, mean age 44.3 years) with pituitary adenomas who exhibited chiasmatic compression and visual field defects, as well as 8 matched healthy controls (4 males and 4 females, mean age 43.3 years), were scanned at 7-T MRI for this prospective study. Whole-brain cortical thickness was calculated using an automated algorithm. A previously published surface-based algorithm was applied to associate the eccentricity and polar angle with each position in V1. Cortical thickness was calculated at each point in the retinotopic organization, and a cortical thickness ratio was generated against matched controls for each point in the visual fields. Patients with adenoma additionally underwent neuroophthalmological examination including 24-2 Humphrey automated visual field perimetry. Pattern deviation (PD) of each point in the visual field, i.e., the deviation in point detection compared with neurologically healthy controls, was correlated with cortical thickness at corresponding polar and eccentricity angles in V1. RESULTS: Whole-brain cortical thickness was successfully derived for all patients and controls. The mean tumor volume was 19.4 cm3. The median global thickness of V1 did not differ between patients (mean ± SD 2.21 ± 0.12 cm), compared with controls (2.06 ± 0.13 cm, p > 0.05). Surface morphometry-based retinotopic maps revealed that all 8 patients with adenoma showed a significant positive correlation between PD and V1 thickness ratios (r values ranged from 0.31 to 0.53, p < 0.05). Mixed-procedure analysis revealed that PD = -8.0719 + 5.5873*[Median V1 Thickness Ratio]. CONCLUSIONS: All 8 patients showed significant positive correlations between V1 thickness and visual defect. These findings provide retinotopic maps of localized V1 cortical neurodegeneration spatially corresponding to impairments in the visual field. These results further characterize changes in the posterior visual pathway associated with chiasmatic compression, and may prove useful in the neuroophthalmological workup for patients with pituitary macroadenoma.
OBJECTIVE:Vision loss remains a debilitating complication of pituitary adenomas, although there is considerable variability in visual impairment before and after decompression surgery. Growing evidence suggests secondary damage to remote visual structures may contribute to vision loss in patients with chiasmatic compression. The present study leverages ultrahigh field 7-T MRI to study the retinotopic organization of the primary visual cortex (V1), and correlates visual defects with cortical thinning in V1 to characterize consequences of pituitary adenomas on the posterior visual system. METHODS: Eight patients (4 males and 4 females, mean age 44.3 years) with pituitary adenomas who exhibited chiasmatic compression and visual field defects, as well as 8 matched healthy controls (4 males and 4 females, mean age 43.3 years), were scanned at 7-T MRI for this prospective study. Whole-brain cortical thickness was calculated using an automated algorithm. A previously published surface-based algorithm was applied to associate the eccentricity and polar angle with each position in V1. Cortical thickness was calculated at each point in the retinotopic organization, and a cortical thickness ratio was generated against matched controls for each point in the visual fields. Patients with adenoma additionally underwent neuroophthalmological examination including 24-2 Humphrey automated visual field perimetry. Pattern deviation (PD) of each point in the visual field, i.e., the deviation in point detection compared with neurologically healthy controls, was correlated with cortical thickness at corresponding polar and eccentricity angles in V1. RESULTS: Whole-brain cortical thickness was successfully derived for all patients and controls. The mean tumor volume was 19.4 cm3. The median global thickness of V1 did not differ between patients (mean ± SD 2.21 ± 0.12 cm), compared with controls (2.06 ± 0.13 cm, p > 0.05). Surface morphometry-based retinotopic maps revealed that all 8 patients with adenoma showed a significant positive correlation between PD and V1 thickness ratios (r values ranged from 0.31 to 0.53, p < 0.05). Mixed-procedure analysis revealed that PD = -8.0719 + 5.5873*[Median V1 Thickness Ratio]. CONCLUSIONS: All 8 patients showed significant positive correlations between V1 thickness and visual defect. These findings provide retinotopic maps of localized V1 cortical neurodegeneration spatially corresponding to impairments in the visual field. These results further characterize changes in the posterior visual pathway associated with chiasmatic compression, and may prove useful in the neuroophthalmological workup for patients with pituitary macroadenoma.
Authors: Jorn Fierstra; Julien Poublanc; Jay Shou Han; Frank Silver; Michael Tymianski; Adrian Phillip Crawley; Joseph Arnold Fisher; David John Mikulis Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: S Hisanaga; S Kakeda; J Yamamoto; K Watanabe; J Moriya; T Nagata; Y Fujino; H Kondo; S Nishizawa; Y Korogi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tina Plank; Jozef Frolo; Sabine Brandl-Rühle; Agnes B Renner; Karsten Hufendiek; Horst Helbig; Mark W Greenlee Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jeffrey R Sims; Anna M Chen; Zhe Sun; Wenyu Deng; Nicole A Colwell; Max K Colbert; Jingyuan Zhu; Anoop Sainulabdeen; Muneeb A Faiq; Ji Won Bang; Kevin C Chan Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Gyule Han; Ji Sun Kim; Yu Hyun Park; Sung Hoon Kang; Hang-Rai Kim; Song Hwangbo; Tae-Young Chung; Hee Young Shin; Duk L Na; Sang Won Seo; Dong Hui Lim; Hee Jin Kim Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 8.823