Literature DB >> 18769929

Suboccipital decompression for Chiari I malformation: outcome comparison of duraplasty with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute versus pericranial autograft.

Frank J Attenello1, Matthew J McGirt, Giannina L Garcés-Ambrossi, Kaisorn L Chaichana, Benjamin Carson, George I Jallo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment failure for Chiari decompression is frequently associated with scarring, intradural adhesions, and recurrent loss of hindbrain space. While autograft has been our standard for hindbrain duraplasty, we investigated whether introducing anti-adhesive synthetic GORE PRECLUDE MVP Dura Substitute (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [ePTFE] graft) was associated with improved patient outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients undergoing first-time suboccipital decompression/duraplasty for Chiari-I malformation utilizing ePTFE graft or pericranial autograft. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at last follow-up was assessed for: (1) recurrent loss of dorsal hindbrain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space/CSF flow(cine-MR) at duraplasty site, (2) pseudomeningocele, or (3) syringomyelia improvement. Symptom recurrence warranting revision surgery was compared between cohorts.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (age 11 +/- 5 years) underwent duraplasty with pericranial autograft (n = 40) or ePTFE graft (n = 27). Perioperative morbidity did not differ between cohorts. No patients receiving ePTFE graft experienced incisional CSF leak, surgical site infection, or symptomatic pseudomeningocele. At median 8 months postoperatively, all (100%) patients with ePTFE graft maintained physiological CSF flow/decompressed hindbrain CSF space on cine-MRI versus 32 (79%) patients receiving pericranial autograft (p < 0.05). Radiographic syrinx improvement occurred in 80% of patients with ePTFE graft and 52% of patients with pericranial autograft (median time to improvement: 5 vs 12 months, respectively, p < 0.05). At median 16 months postoperatively, four (10%) patients with pericranial autograft required revision decompression versus 0 (0%) patients with ePTFE graft (p = 0.090).
CONCLUSION: Duraplasty utilizing ePTFE graft was associated with improved maintenance of hindbrain space, accelerated syringomyelia improvement, and a trend toward decreased treatment failure versus pericranial autograft. Future studies of long-term outcome are warranted to confirm observed effects. Synthetic ePTFE graft is a safe alternative for duraplasty in the setting of Chiari malformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769929     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-008-0700-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  45 in total

1.  Chiari I malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients.

Authors:  T H Milhorat; M W Chou; E M Trinidad; R W Kula; M Mandell; C Wolpert; M C Speer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Long-term results of the clinical use of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane as a pericardial substitute.

Authors:  Y Harada; Y Imai; H Kurosawa; S Hoshino; K Nakano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Correlation of cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics and headache in Chiari I malformation.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Shahid M Nimjee; James Floyd; Ketan R Bulsara; Timothy M George
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Relationship of cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with outcome after decompression for Chiari I malformations.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Shahid M Nimjee; Herbert E Fuchs; Timothy M George
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Considerations in the diagnosis and treatment of syringomyelia and the Chiari malformation.

Authors:  L D Cahan; J R Bentson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Effectiveness and handling characteristics of a three-layer polymer dura substitute: a prospective multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  A Martina Messing-Jünger; Javier Ibáñez; Fabio Calbucci; Maurice Choux; Gabriel Lena; Iradj Mohsenipour; Frank Van Calenbergh
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Chiari I malformations: clinical and radiologic reappraisal.

Authors:  A D Elster; M Y Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Surgical experience in 130 pediatric patients with Chiari I malformations.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; Matthew J McGirt; W Jerry Oakes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Symptomatic Chiari malformations. An analysis of presentation, management, and long-term outcome.

Authors:  G N Dyste; A H Menezes; J C VanGilder
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Improving surgery on the aging neck with an adjustable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene cervical sling.

Authors:  Arvind Prabhat; Wallace K Dyer
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec
View more
  17 in total

1.  Subcutaneous blood patch for iatrogenic suboccipital pseudomeningocele following decompressive suboccipital craniectomy and enlarging duroplasty for the treatment of Chiari I malformation. Technical note.

Authors:  G Paternoster; L Massimi; G Capone; G Tamburrini; M Caldarelli; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Pathogenesis of syringomyelia associated with Chiari type 1 malformation: review of evidences and proposal of a new hypothesis.

Authors:  Izumi Koyanagi; Kiyohiro Houkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Risks and outcomes of spinal deformity surgery in Chiari malformation, Type 1, with syringomyelia versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jakub Godzik; Terrence F Holekamp; David D Limbrick; Lawrence G Lenke; T S Park; Wilson Z Ray; Keith H Bridwell; Michael P Kelly
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 4.  Duraplasty or not? An evidence-based review of the pediatric Chiari I malformation.

Authors:  Todd Hankinson; R Shane Tubbs; John C Wellons
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Outcomes after suboccipital decompression without dural opening in children with Chiari malformation Type I.

Authors:  Benjamin C Kennedy; Kathleen M Kelly; Michelle Q Phan; Samuel S Bruce; Michael M McDowell; Richard C E Anderson; Neil A Feldstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Bony decompression vs duraplasty for Chiari I malformation: does the eternal dilemma matter?

Authors:  Luca Massimi; P Frassanito; F Bianchi; G Tamburrini; M Caldarelli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in paediatric Chiari surgery-help or hindrance?

Authors:  Fahid T Rasul; Samir A Matloob; Nikolaos Haliasos; Ivana Jankovic; Stewart Boyd; Dominic N P Thompson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Treatment of symptomatic Chiari I malformation by "all-factors-surgery": a report of 194 cases.

Authors:  Weihua Chu; Xin Chen; Xingsen Xue; Guangjian He; Jingjing Liu; Hongyan Zhang; Hua Feng; Jiangkai Lin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of dural grafts in Chiari decompression surgery: Review of the literature.

Authors:  Adib A Abla; Timothy Link; David Fusco; David A Wilson; Volker K H Sonntag
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2010-01

10.  Comparison of dural grafts and methods of graft fixation in Chiari malformation type I decompression surgery.

Authors:  Artur Balasa; Przemysław Kunert; Tomasz Dziedzic; Mateusz Bielecki; Sławomir Kujawski; Andrzej Marchel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.