Literature DB >> 33616790

Treatment of symptomatic Chiari I malformation by "all-factors-surgery": a report of 194 cases.

Weihua Chu1, Xin Chen1, Xingsen Xue1, Guangjian He1, Jingjing Liu1, Hongyan Zhang1, Hua Feng1, Jiangkai Lin2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Inadequate decompressions can lead to poor improvement of symptoms in patients with Chiari I malformation (CMI). In this study, the "all-factors-surgery" that including all levels decompressions was performed on symptomatic CMI patients for the snake of eliminating all possible pathogenic factors and reducing the chance of reoperation.
METHODS: The "all-factors-surgery" combined operations of posterior fossa decompression, enlarged cranioplasty, duraplasty, cerebellar tonsil partial resection and adhesion release. Total 194 patients from January 2010 to December 2015. The outcome measures included improvement rate of symptoms, patients self-evaluation (improved, unchanged, worsened), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) score, the diameter of the syrinx and complications.
RESULTS: Postoperative data were collected from the three stages: at discharge, the short-term follow-up (average, 9.39 months), and the long-term follow-up (average, 54.44 months). Patients self-evaluation improvement rate in the three follow-up stages was 92.27%, 90.07% and 85.93%. The VAS scores (mean, 1.49, 1.21, 1.47 vs 3.76) and JOA scores (mean, 15.66, 15.99, 16.10 vs 14.84) were significant difference between the follow-up and pre-operation (P < .05). The CCOS scores of short-term and long-term follow-up were significantly better than that at discharge (mean, 14.75, 14.87 vs 13.68) (P < .05). The diameter of syrinx in each follow-up stage was significantly less than that in pre-operation (mean, 3.39, 1.95, 1.87 vs 5.09) (P < .05). There were no serious complications, and no one asked for reoperation during the follow up.
CONCLUSION: Symptomatic CMI patients undergoing "all-factors-surgery" had persistently high rates of symptom relief and rarely needed reoperation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chiari I malformation; Complications; Outcome; Surgical approach

Year:  2021        PMID: 33616790     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06720-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Monitoring of cerebrospinal fluid flow by intraoperative ultrasound in patients with Chiari I malformation.

Authors:  Li-Gang Cui; Ling Jiang; Hua-Bin Zhang; Bin Liu; Jin-Rui Wang; Jian-Wen Jia; Wen Chen
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.876

2.  Intraoperative Ultrasonography for Definition of Less Invasive Surgical Technique in Patients with Chiari Type I Malformation.

Authors:  Roger Schmidt Brock; Mario Augusto Taricco; Matheus Fernandes de Oliveira; Marcelo de Lima Oliveira; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Edson Bor-Seng-Shu
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Relationship of cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with outcome after decompression for Chiari I malformations.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Shahid M Nimjee; Herbert E Fuchs; Timothy M George
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Natural history of Chiari malformation Type I following decision for conservative treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer Strahle; Karin M Muraszko; Joseph Kapurch; J Rajiv Bapuraj; Hugh J L Garton; Cormac O Maher
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Suboccipital decompression for Chiari I malformation: outcome comparison of duraplasty with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute versus pericranial autograft.

Authors:  Frank J Attenello; Matthew J McGirt; Giannina L Garcés-Ambrossi; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Benjamin Carson; George I Jallo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of Chiari I Malformation: Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jian-Lan Zhao; Mei-Hua Li; Chun-Liang Wang; Wei Meng
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Comparison decompression by duraplasty or cerebellar tonsillectomy for Chiari malformation-I complicated with syringomyelia.

Authors:  Chong Jia; Hongwei Li; Junru Wu; Kun Gao; Cheng Bin Zhao; Mu Li; Xiang Sun; Bo Yang
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 1.876

8.  Intraoperative ultrasonography as a guide to patient selection for duraplasty after suboccipital decompression in children with Chiari malformation Type I.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Frank J Attenello; Ghazala Datoo; Muraya Gathinji; April Atiba; Jon D Weingart; Benjamin Carson; George I Jallo
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Comparison of Dural Peeling versus Duraplasty for Surgical Treatment of Chiari Type I Malformation: Results and Complications in a Monocentric Patients' Cohort.

Authors:  Nicole Del Gaudio; Geraldo Vaz; Thierry Duprez; Christian Raftopoulos
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 10.  The case for duraplasty in adults undergoing posterior fossa decompression for Chiari I malformation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Petter Förander; Kristin Sjåvik; Ole Solheim; Ingrid Riphagen; Sasha Gulati; Øyvind Salvesen; Asgeir Store Jakola
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 1.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.