Literature DB >> 18769661

Why epidurals do not always work.

Katherine Arendt, Scott Segal.   

Abstract

The overwhelming majority of epidural catheters placed for labor provide satisfactory analgesia. There are, however, times when the catheter is not sited within the epidural space correctly, the patient's neuraxial anatomy is problematic, or a patient's labor progresses more quickly than expected by the anesthesiologist, and the epidural block does not set up on time. In this article, the basics of neuraxial labor analgesia, the causes of its failure, and the strategies anesthesiologists employ to rescue poorly functioning catheters are reviewed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined spinal epidural technique; Dural puncture; Epidural failure; Neuraxial labor analgesia

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769661      PMCID: PMC2505163     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1941-2797


  22 in total

1.  Epidural catheter tip position and distribution of injectate evaluated by computed tomography.

Authors:  Q Hogan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Current concepts in resuscitation of patients with local anesthetic cardiac toxicity.

Authors:  Guy L Weinberg
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Accidental subdural injection during attempted lumbar epidural block may present as a failed or inadequate block: radiographic evidence.

Authors:  Clive B Collier
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  The dorsomedian connective tissue band in the lumbar epidural space of humans: an anatomical study using epiduroscopy in autopsy cases.

Authors:  R Blomberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  The laminectomy membrane. Studies in its evolution, characteristics, effects and prophylaxis in dogs.

Authors:  H LaRocca; I Macnab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1974-08

6.  Resin injection studies of the lumbar extradural space.

Authors:  G R Harrison; I G Parkin; J L Shah
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Delayed onset of epidural anesthesia in patients with back pain.

Authors:  H T Benzon; R Braunschweig; R E Molloy
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  S Eappen; A Blinn; S Segal
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.603

9.  Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries.

Authors:  P H Pan; T D Bogard; M D Owen
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.603

10.  Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour.

Authors:  R E Collis; D W Davies; W Aveling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-06-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comment on "why epidurals do not always work".

Authors:  Apiliogullari Seza; Duman Ates; Sema Soysal
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

2.  Successful use of unilateral spinal block after failed epidural block in a patient with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Naresh Dhawan; Vipul K Sharma; Rajeev Nair
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-03-29

3.  Labor, delivery, and anesthesia experiences of women with physical disability.

Authors:  Suzanne C Smeltzer; Amy J Wint; Jeffrey L Ecker; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  The effect of anaesthetist grade and frequency of insertion on epidural failure: a service evaluation in a United Kingdom teaching hospital.

Authors:  Thomas P Heinink; Benjamin G Baker; Victoria F Yates; Dorothea C Addison; John P Williams
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  An anatomical study of lumbar epidural catheterization.

Authors:  Huanwei Jiang; Benchao Shi; Shiyuan Xu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xibing Ding; Shuqing Jin; Xiaoyin Niu; Hao Ren; Shukun Fu; Quan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development and validation of a predictive risk factor model for epidural re-siting in women undergoing labour epidural analgesia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  John Song En Lee; Rehena Sultana; Nian Lin Reena Han; Alex Tiong Heng Sia; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 8.  The Options for Neuraxial Drug Administration.

Authors:  Henning Hermanns; Elke M E Bos; Mark L van Zuylen; Markus W Hollmann; Markus F Stevens
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.497

9.  Economic Outcomes and Incidence of Postsurgical Hypotension With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries.

Authors:  Margaret Holtz; Nick Liao; Jennifer H Lin; Carl V Asche
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-09-14

10.  Smart Optical Catheters for Epidurals.

Authors:  Benito Carotenuto; Armando Ricciardi; Alberto Micco; Ezio Amorizzo; Marco Mercieri; Antonello Cutolo; Andrea Cusano
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.