Literature DB >> 7760614

Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour.

R E Collis1, D W Davies, W Aveling.   

Abstract

Epidural analgesia has a well-established role in labour, but has the drawbacks of delayed onset and motor blockade. The combined spinal-epidural technique may overcome these drawbacks. We carried out a randomised observational study to assess maternal satisfaction with the standard and combined techniques among 197 women in labour. For combined spinal-epidural analgesia, bupivacaine (2.5 mg) and fentanyl (25 micrograms) were initially injected into the subarachnoid space, followed by top-ups of 15 mL 0.1% bupivacaine with 2 micrograms/mL fentanyl into the epidural space, as required. For standard epidural analgesia, 25 mg (10 mL of 0.25%) bupivacaine was injected into the epidural space, followed by top-ups of 6-10 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, as required. Post partum, each woman completed a questionnaire about her labour and scored various items on a visual analogue scale (0 = best, 100 = worst outcome). Overall satisfaction was greater in the combined spinal-epidural group than in the standard epidural group (median [IQR] score 3 [2-10] vs 9 [3-22]; p = 0.0002). Good analgesia was achieved in both groups, but the combined spinal-epidural had faster onset of analgesia and more of this group were satisfied with analgesia at 20 min (92/98 vs 68/99, p < 0.0001). 12 women in the combined spinal-epidural group had leg weakness (as shown by an inability to raise the straight legs) at 20 min, but this initial motor block had resolved in most of these mothers by 1 h. In the standard epidural group 32 had leg weakness at 20 min (p = 0.001), and the proportion of mothers with weakness increased in this group during labour. There were no differences in side-effects, except for mild pruritus, which was more common in the combined spinal-epidural group (42 vs 1%; p < 0.0001). Overall, women seem to prefer the low-dose combined spinal-epidural technique to standard epidurals, perhaps because of the faster onset, less motor block, and feelings of greater self-control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7760614     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92602-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  22 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia.

Authors:  A J Fox; D J Rowbotham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-28

Review 2.  Intrathecal opioids for combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour.

Authors:  Peter DeBalli; Terrance W Breen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Why epidurals do not always work.

Authors:  Katherine Arendt; Scott Segal
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

4.  Optimal labour analgesia 1996.

Authors:  T W Breen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Neda Taghizadeh; Alicia T Dennis; Damien Hughes; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

6.  Walking Epidural : An Effective Method of Labour Pain Relief.

Authors:  R M Sharma; R Setlur; A K Bhargava; S Vardhan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 7.  Recent advances. Obstetrics.

Authors:  P Steer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-04

8.  Factors affecting fetal bradycardia following combined spinal epidural for labor analgesia: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Su Lin Maureen Cheng; Dianne Bautista; Serene Leo; Tiong Heng Alex Sia
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Phase 1 development of an index to measure the quality of neuraxial labour analgesia: exploring the perspectives of childbearing women.

Authors:  Pamela Angle; Christine Kurtz Landy; Cathy Charles; Jennifer Yee; Jo Watson; Rose Kung; Jean Kronberg; Stephen Halpern; Desmond Lam; Lie Ming Lie; David Streiner
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  The Pain of Labour.

Authors:  Simona Labor; Simon Maguire
Journal:  Rev Pain       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.