Yuka Kimura1, Eiichi Tsuda2, Yasuharu Hiraga2, Yuji Yamamoto2, Shugo Maeda2, Yasuyuki Ishibashi2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Zaifu-cho 5, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan. yukax10@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Zaifu-cho 5, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate knee kinematics during double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-PCLR) intraoperatively using a navigation system, and especially assess biomechanical behaviour of the anterolateral bundle (ALB) and posteromedial bundle (PMB) graft in DB-PCLR. Also, clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up were investigated. METHODS: Nine patients received DB-PCLR with hamstring graft. Before reconstruction, knee laxities, including posterior tibial translation (PTT) in neutral rotation at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion, were measured using a kinematic-based navigation system. After the PMB or ALB was temporally fixed, the knee laxities were measured in the same manner. Each patient was evaluated pre- and post-operatively with side-to-side difference of tibial position in gravity sag view and Lysholm score. RESULTS: Both ALB and PMB fixation restrained the PTT compared to PCL deficiency throughout all knee flexion angles. At 90° of knee flexion, ALB fixation significantly decreased PTT compare to PMB fixation (p = 0.014) and DB-PCLR significantly decreased PTT compare to ALB fixation (p = 0.045). The mean side-to-side difference of tibial position in gravity sag view was 12.0 ± 1.7 mm preoperatively and 2.3 ± 1.8 mm at final follow-up, and the mean Lysholm scores were 68.9 ± 20.9 and 96.3 ± 2.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the PTT between ALB and PMB fixations at 0° to 75° of knee flexion, and both ALB and PMB reconstructions are important for restraining PTT. At 90° of knee flexion, the ALB grafts may be more important to control PTT compared to PMB grafts; however, neither single-bundle reconstruction with ALB nor PMB could function as DB-PCLR did. In addition, PTT after DB-PCLR was strongly correlated side-to-side difference in posterior sag view at the final follow-up. The results from this study indicated that both ALB and PMB are important to stabilize PCL-deficient knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate knee kinematics during double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-PCLR) intraoperatively using a navigation system, and especially assess biomechanical behaviour of the anterolateral bundle (ALB) and posteromedial bundle (PMB) graft in DB-PCLR. Also, clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up were investigated. METHODS: Nine patients received DB-PCLR with hamstring graft. Before reconstruction, knee laxities, including posterior tibial translation (PTT) in neutral rotation at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° of knee flexion, were measured using a kinematic-based navigation system. After the PMB or ALB was temporally fixed, the knee laxities were measured in the same manner. Each patient was evaluated pre- and post-operatively with side-to-side difference of tibial position in gravity sag view and Lysholm score. RESULTS: Both ALB and PMB fixation restrained the PTT compared to PCL deficiency throughout all knee flexion angles. At 90° of knee flexion, ALB fixation significantly decreased PTT compare to PMB fixation (p = 0.014) and DB-PCLR significantly decreased PTT compare to ALB fixation (p = 0.045). The mean side-to-side difference of tibial position in gravity sag view was 12.0 ± 1.7 mm preoperatively and 2.3 ± 1.8 mm at final follow-up, and the mean Lysholm scores were 68.9 ± 20.9 and 96.3 ± 2.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the PTT between ALB and PMB fixations at 0° to 75° of knee flexion, and both ALB and PMB reconstructions are important for restraining PTT. At 90° of knee flexion, the ALB grafts may be more important to control PTT compared to PMB grafts; however, neither single-bundle reconstruction with ALB nor PMB could function as DB-PCLR did. In addition, PTT after DB-PCLR was strongly correlated side-to-side difference in posterior sag view at the final follow-up. The results from this study indicated that both ALB and PMB are important to stabilize PCL-deficient knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.
Authors: Christopher S Ahmad; Zohara A Cohen; William N Levine; Thomas R Gardner; Gerard A Ateshian; Van C Mow Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Ramprasad Papannagari; Louis E DeFrate; Kyung W Nha; Jeremy M Moses; Mohamed Moussa; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-03-21 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: C D Harner; J W Xerogeanes; G A Livesay; G J Carlin; B A Smith; T Kusayama; S Kashiwaguchi; S L Woo Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 1995 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Marcin Kowalczuk; Marie-Claude Leblanc; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 4.342