Literature DB >> 18768514

Talc use, variants of the GSTM1, GSTT1, and NAT2 genes, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Margaret A Gates1, Shelley S Tworoger, Kathryn L Terry, Linda Titus-Ernstoff, Bernard Rosner, Immaculata De Vivo, Daniel W Cramer, Susan E Hankinson.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic evidence suggests a possible association between genital use of talcum powder and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, the biological basis for this association is not clear. We analyzed interactions between talc use and genes in detoxification pathways [glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1), glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1), and N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2)] to assess whether the talc/ovarian cancer association is modified by variants of genes potentially involved in the response to talc. Our analysis included 1,175 cases and 1,202 controls from a New England-based case-control study and 210 cases and 600 controls from the prospective Nurses' Health Study. We genotyped participants for the GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene deletions and three NAT2 polymorphisms. We used logistic regression to analyze the main effect of talc use, genotype, and gene-talc interactions in each population and pooled the estimates using a random-effects model. Regular talc use was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk in the combined study population (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14-1.63; P(trend) < 0.001). Independent of talc, the genes examined were not clearly associated with risk. However, the talc/ovarian cancer association varied by GSTT1 genotype and combined GSTM1/GSTT1 genotype. In the pooled analysis, the association with talc was stronger among women with the GSTT1-null genotype (P(interaction) = 0.03), particularly in combination with the GSTM1-present genotype (P(interaction) = 0.03). There was no clear evidence of an interaction with GSTM1 alone or NAT2. These results suggest that women with certain genetic variants may have a higher risk of ovarian cancer associated with genital talc use. Additional research is needed on these interactions and the underlying biological mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768514      PMCID: PMC2630413          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  46 in total

1.  The transport of carbon particles in the human female reproductive tract.

Authors:  G E EGLI; M NEWTON
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1961 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Genital talc exposure and risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D W Cramer; R F Liberman; L Titus-Ernstoff; W R Welch; E R Greenberg; J A Baron; B L Harlow
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Perineal powder exposure and the risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  L S Cook; M L Kamb; N S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Asbestos--still a carcinogen.

Authors:  P J Landrigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-05-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Glutathione S-transferase and N-acetyltransferase genotypes and asbestos-associated pulmonary disorders.

Authors:  A Hirvonen; S T Saarikoski; K Linnainmaa; K Koskinen; K Husgafvel-Pursiainen; K Mattson; H Vainio
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-12-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  A meta-analytical approach examining the potential relationship between talc exposure and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A J Gross; P H Berg
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun

7.  The relationship between perineal cosmetic talc usage and ovarian talc particle burden.

Authors:  D S Heller; C Westhoff; R E Gordon; N Katz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Possible role of ovarian epithelial inflammation in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R B Ness; C Cottreau
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  A review of perineal talc exposure and risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B L Harlow; P A Hartge
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Inherited GSTM1 and NAT2 defects as concurrent risk modifiers in asbestos-related human malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  A Hirvonen; K Pelin; L Tammilehto; A Karjalainen; K Mattson; K Linnainmaa
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  21 in total

1.  Interaction between use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selected genetic polymorphisms in ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Simone P Pinheiro; Margaret A Gates; Immaculata De Vivo; Bernard A Rosner; Shelley S Tworoger; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Susan E Hankinson; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2010-09-03

2.  Duarte galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase genotypes are not associated with ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Melissa A Merritt; Joanne Kotsopoulos; Daniel W Cramer; Susan E Hankinson; Kathryn L Terry; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Association between glutathione S-transferase M 1 null genotype and risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yihua Yin; Lingda Feng; Jing Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-07-25

4.  Does bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian retention warrant consideration as a temporary bridge to risk-reducing bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers?

Authors:  Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai; Peter E Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Perineal use of talcum powder and endometrial cancer risk.

Authors:  Stalo Karageorgi; Margaret A Gates; Susan E Hankinson; Immaculata De Vivo
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Current understanding of risk factors for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Thanasak Sueblinvong; Michael E Carney
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-07-15

Review 7.  Review of the Gene-Environment Interaction Literature in Cancer: What Do We Know?

Authors:  Naoko I Simonds; Armen A Ghazarian; Camilla B Pimentel; Sheri D Schully; Gary L Ellison; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Leah E Mechanic
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and risk of ovarian cancer in four studies.

Authors:  Shelley S Tworoger; Margaret A Gates; Margaret A Gate; I-Min Lee; Julie E Buring; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Daniel Cramer; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Common genetic variation in IGF1, IGFBP1 and IGFBP3 and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Kathryn L Terry; Shelley S Tworoger; Margaret A Gates; Daniel W Cramer; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Coffee intake, variants in genes involved in caffeine metabolism, and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joanne Kotsopoulos; Allison F Vitonis; Kathryn L Terry; Immaculata De Vivo; Daniel W Cramer; Susan E Hankinson; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.