Literature DB >> 18763860

DNA double-strand breaks induced by very low X-ray doses are largely due to bystander effects.

Mitsuaki Ojima1, Nobuhiko Ban, Michiaki Kai.   

Abstract

Phosphorylated ATM immunofluorescence staining was used to investigate the dose-response relationship for the number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced in primary normal human fibroblasts irradiated with doses from 1.2 to 200 mGy. The induction of DSBs showed a supralinear dose-response relationship. Radiation-induced bystander effects may explain these findings. To test this hypothesis, the number of DSBs in cells treated with lindane, an inhibitor of radiation-induced bystander effects, prior to X irradiation was assessed; a supralinear dose-response relationship was not observed. Moreover, the number of DSBs obtained by subtracting the number of phosphorylated ATM foci in lindane-treated cells from the number of phosphorylated ATM foci in untreated cells was proportional to the dose at low doses (1.2-5 mGy) and was saturated at doses from 10-200 mGy. Thus the increase in the number of DSBs in the range of 1.2-5 mGy was largely due to radiation-induced bystander effects, while at doses >10 mGy, the DSBs may be induced mainly by dose-dependent direct radiation effects and partly by dose-independent radiation-induced bystander effects. The findings in our present study provide direct evidence of the dose-response relationship for radiation-induced bystander effects from broad-beam X rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18763860     DOI: 10.1667/RR1255.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  17 in total

Review 1.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Effects of irradiation on tumor cell survival, invasion and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Odysseas Kargiotis; Aliki Geka; Jasti S Rao; Athanasios P Kyritsis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  ATM, radiation, and the risk of second primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jonine L Bernstein; Patrick Concannon
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 4.  Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk?

Authors:  Patricia K Nguyen; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-02

5.  Quantification of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair foci to evaluate and predict biological responses to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Sébastien Penninckx; Eloise Pariset; Egle Cekanaviciute; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2021-12-22

Review 6.  Ionizing radiation and aging: rejuvenating an old idea.

Authors:  Richard B Richardson
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  Dose and Time Dependence of Targeted and Untargeted Effects after Very Low Doses of α-Particle Irradiation of Human Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  A Belchior; O Monteiro Gil; P Almeida; P Vaz
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  Basic principles of molecular effects of irradiation.

Authors:  Edgar Selzer; Alexandra Hebar
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-02

Review 9.  Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses.

Authors:  Masanori Tomita; Munetoshi Maeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Cellular automaton-based model for radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Yuya Hattori; Akinari Yokoya; Ritsuko Watanabe
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2015-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.