OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a scoring system combining zygote and embryo morphology in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. METHODS: In a study group, 117 consecutive IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with embryo transfer were carried out and 312 embryos were scored using a combined scoring system (CSS) of zygote and embryo morphology before transplantation. In a control group, a total of 420 IVF or ICSI cycles were carried out and 1176 embryos were scored using a cumulative embryo score (CES). The effects of the combined scoring system on the embryo implantation rate and pregnancy rate per cycle were analyzed. RESULTS: Using the combined scoring system, the embryo implantation rate (27.6%) and the clinical pregnancy rate (48.7%) were significantly higher than those in the control group (20.8% and 38.6%, respectively). Also, the implantation rate of embryos scoring>or=70 (38.5%: 82 sacs/213 embryos) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than that of embryos scoring<70 (4%: 4 sacs/99 embryos). The pregnancy rate of patients with embryos scoring>or=70 using the combined scoring system (66.7%) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than that of patients with embryos scoring>or=20 using the cumulative embryo score (59.0%). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that selecting embryos with a high score (>or=70) using the combined scoring system could increase the implantation rate and pregnancy rate, and that using a scoring system combining assessments of human zygotes and pre-implantation embryos might predict IVF outcomes more accurately than using a cumulative embryo score.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a scoring system combining zygote and embryo morphology in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. METHODS: In a study group, 117 consecutive IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with embryo transfer were carried out and 312 embryos were scored using a combined scoring system (CSS) of zygote and embryo morphology before transplantation. In a control group, a total of 420 IVF or ICSI cycles were carried out and 1176 embryos were scored using a cumulative embryo score (CES). The effects of the combined scoring system on the embryo implantation rate and pregnancy rate per cycle were analyzed. RESULTS: Using the combined scoring system, the embryo implantation rate (27.6%) and the clinical pregnancy rate (48.7%) were significantly higher than those in the control group (20.8% and 38.6%, respectively). Also, the implantation rate of embryos scoring>or=70 (38.5%: 82 sacs/213 embryos) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than that of embryos scoring<70 (4%: 4 sacs/99 embryos). The pregnancy rate of patients with embryos scoring>or=70 using the combined scoring system (66.7%) was significantly higher (P<0.001) than that of patients with embryos scoring>or=20 using the cumulative embryo score (59.0%). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that selecting embryos with a high score (>or=70) using the combined scoring system could increase the implantation rate and pregnancy rate, and that using a scoring system combining assessments of human zygotes and pre-implantation embryos might predict IVF outcomes more accurately than using a cumulative embryo score.
Authors: Giuseppe De Placido; Martin Wilding; Ida Strina; Erminia Alviggi; Carlo Alviggi; Antonio Mollo; Maria Teresa Varicchio; Achille Tolino; Cristina Schiattarella; Brian Dale Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Laura A Schieve; Susan F Meikle; Cynthia Ferre; Herbert B Peterson; Gary Jeng; Lynne S Wilcox Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amin A Milki; Mary D Hinckley; Janice Gebhardt; Daniel Dasig; Lynn M Westphal; Barry Behr Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Judy E Stern; Sangita K Jindal; Catherine Racowsky; G David Ball Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Alessia Nicoli; Stefano Palomba; Francesco Capodanno; Maria Fini; Angela Falbo; Giovanni Battista La Sala Journal: J Ovarian Res Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 4.234