Literature DB >> 11527907

The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos.

J D Fisch1, H Rodriguez, R Ross, G Overby, G Sher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Embryo morphology and cleavage rates alone do not consistently identify embryos with high implantation potential following IVF. Blastocyst transfer has been reported to improve success rates by identifying potentially superior quality embryos. Algorithms for predicting IVF outcomes based on the presence of early developmental milestones have been proposed. Here we introduce the Graduated Embryo Score (GES).
METHODS: Nucleolar alignment along the pronuclear axis, regular cleavage and degree of fragmentation at the first cell division, and cell number and morphology on day 3 were weighted to create a possible GES of 100 for each of 1245 fertilized embryos derived from 109 patients aged <40 years. The GES was correlated with IVF outcome.
RESULTS: Of 983 embryos for extended culture, 349 (36%) developed to blastocyst and 180 (18%) were good quality (grade I-II). When ranked by cell number and morphology alone, 34% of embryos with > or =7 cells and <20% fragmentation formed good quality blastocysts. Using GES, embryos scoring 90-100 had 64% blastocyst formation compared with 31% scoring 70-85 and with 11% scoring 30-65. Embryos scoring 70-100 had 44% blastocyst development compared with 9% scoring 0-65. Fifty-six patients (51%) conceived on-going gestations from 294 transferred embryos. In patients with at least one transferred embryo scoring > or =70, the pregnancy rate was 59% compared with 34% if all embryos scored <70. The overall implantation rate was 28%. Among embryos scoring 70-100, an implantation rate of 39% was seen, compared with 24% among embryos scoring 0-65.
CONCLUSIONS: Predicting which cleaved embryos will form blastocysts could permit the high success rates associated with blastocyst transfer to be achieved from day 3 embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11527907     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

1.  Reducing inter-observer variability in embryo evaluation by means of training courses.

Authors:  Rafael Ruiz de Assin; Ana Clavero; Maria Carmen Gonzalvo; Antonio Rosales; Sandra Zamora; Luis Martinez; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The impact of pronuclear orientation to select chromosomally normal embryos.

Authors:  Edson Júnior Borges; Lia Mara Rossi; Leila Farah; Patricia Guilherme; Claudia C Rocha; Valdemar Ortiz; Assumpto Júnior Iaconelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Human blastocyst culture and derivation of embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Ariff Bongso; Shawna Tan
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Effect of red light on the development and quality of mammalian embryos.

Authors:  Rong Li; Kamilla Sofie Pedersen; Ying Liu; Hanne Skovsgaard Pedersen; Mette Lægdsmand; Lars Fledelius Rickelt; Michael Kühl; Henrik Callesen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Embryo selection criteria based on morphology VERSUS the expression of a biochemical marker (sHLA-G) and a graduated embryo score: prediction of pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Dirk J Kotze; Polly Hansen; Levent Keskintepe; Ellen Snowden; Geoffrey Sher; Thinus Kruger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Derivation of human embryonic stem cells using a post-inner cell mass intermediate.

Authors:  Thomas O'Leary; Björn Heindryckx; Sylvie Lierman; Margot Van der Jeught; Galbha Duggal; Petra De Sutter; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Cleavage Speed and Blastomere Number in DBA/2J Compared with C57BL/6J Mouse Embryos.

Authors:  Hirofumi Nishizono; Kyosuke Uno; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Accuracy of a combined score of zygote and embryo morphology for selecting the best embryos for IVF.

Authors:  Yu-li Qian; Ying-hui Ye; Chen-ming Xu; Fan Jin; He-feng Huang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos.

Authors:  Goedele Paternot; Johanna Devroe; Sophie Debrock; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Carl Spiessens
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.

Authors:  Amr A Kader; Audrey Choi; Yasser Orief; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.