Literature DB >> 22610490

Femoral head-neck offset measurements in 339 subjects: distribution and implications for femoroacetabular impingement.

Christian R Fraitzl1, Thomas Kappe, Friederike Pennekamp, Heiko Reichel, Christian Billich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The α-angle is a frequently used measurement to quantify head-neck offset pathology in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. However, diverging norm values and reference intervals have been described, especially in men.
METHODS: The α-angle, the head-neck offset ratio and the triangular index were measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of 339 (170 men and 169 women) subjects without evident underlying hip pathology.
RESULTS: For male subjects, the mean α-angle was 49.4° (SD 10.5°) on anteroposterior and 49.1° (SD 10.6°) on lateral radiographs, whereas for female subjects, it was 45.0° (SD 8.0°) and 46.1° (SD 9.9°), respectively. Thus, calculated upper limits of reference intervals in the population screened were 70° for both radiographic projections in men and 61° (anteroposterior) and 66° (lateral) in women.
CONCLUSION: These data substantiate recent findings that the pathological threshold of the α-angle in male subjects may be lower than that previously assumed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610490     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2042-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  19 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Statistical consideration for bilateral cases in orthopaedic research.

Authors:  Moon Seok Park; Sung Ju Kim; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi; Sang Hyeong Lee; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip.

Authors:  Nicholas H Mast; Franco Impellizzeri; Stephan Keller; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Ryan M Nunley; Robert J Otto; Perry L Schoenecker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

7.  Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population.

Authors:  Paul A Toogood; Anthony Skalak; Daniel R Cooperman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  An examination of the association between different morphotypes of femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic subjects and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  G Hartofilakidis; N V Bardakos; G C Babis; G Georgiades
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-05

9.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  M Beck; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

10.  A new radiological index for assessing asphericity of the femoral head in cam impingement.

Authors:  K K Gosvig; S Jacobsen; H Palm; S Sonne-Holm; E Magnusson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Modified head-neck offset for diagnosing anterior femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  Aloїs Espié; Fanny Elia; Jérôme Murgier; Philippe Chiron; Benoit Chaput
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Cornelius Sebastian Fischer; Jens-Peter Kühn; Till Ittermann; Carsten-Oliver Schmidt; Denis Gümbel; Richard Kasch; Matthias Frank; René Laqua; Peter Hinz; Jörn Lange
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Classifying Cam Morphology by the Alpha Angle: A Systematic Review on Threshold Values.

Authors:  Pim van Klij; Michael P Reiman; Jan H Waarsing; Max Reijman; Wichor M Bramer; Jan A N Verhaar; Rintje Agricola
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-10

4.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Stephanie Pun; Deepak Kumar; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.995

6.  Hip Arthroscopy in the Presence of Acetabular Dysplasia.

Authors:  Narlaka Jayasekera; Alessandro Aprato; Richard N Villar
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-29

7.  Good long-term outcome of the untreated contralateral hip in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis : Forty hips with a mean follow-up of 41 years.

Authors:  Anders Wensaas; Ragnhild B Gunderson; Svein Svenningsen; Terje Terjesen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 8.  Controversial Issues in Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Vikas Khanduja; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-10-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.