Literature DB >> 18757931

Correlation-based inference for linkage disequilibrium with multiple alleles.

Dmitri V Zaykin1, Alexander Pudovkin, Bruce S Weir.   

Abstract

The correlation between alleles at a pair of genetic loci is a measure of linkage disequilibrium. The square of the sample correlation multiplied by sample size provides the usual test statistic for the hypothesis of no disequilibrium for loci with two alleles and this relation has proved useful for study design and marker selection. Nevertheless, this relation holds only in a diallelic case, and an extension to multiple alleles has not been made. Here we introduce a similar statistic, R2, which leads to a correlation-based test for loci with multiple alleles: for a pair of loci with k and m alleles, and a sample of n individuals, the approximate distribution of n(k - 1)(m - 1)/(km)R2 under independence between loci is chi2(k-1(m-1). One advantage of this statistic is that it can be interpreted as the total correlation between a pair of loci. When the phase of two-locus genotypes is known, the approach is equivalent to a test for the overall correlation between rows and columns in a contingency table. In the phase-known case, R2 is the sum of the squared sample correlations for all km 2 x 2 subtables formed by collapsing to one allele vs. the rest at each locus. We examine the approximate distribution under the null of independence for R2 and report its close agreement with the exact distribution obtained by permutation. The test for independence using R2 is a strong competitor to approaches such as Pearson's chi square, Fisher's exact test, and a test based on Cressie and Read's power divergence statistic. We combine this approach with our previous composite-disequilibrium measures to address the case when the genotypic phase is unknown. Calculation of the new multiallele test statistic and its P-value is very simple and utilizes the approximate distribution of R2. We provide a computer program that evaluates approximate as well as "exact" permutational P-values.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757931      PMCID: PMC2535703          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.089409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  24 in total

1.  The D' measure of overall gametic disequilibrium between pairs of multiallelic loci.

Authors:  C Zapata
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Tests for association of gene frequencies at several loci in random mating diploid populations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Genetic structure of human populations.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan K Pritchard; James L Weber; Howard M Cann; Kenneth K Kidd; Lev A Zhivotovsky; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Bounds and normalization of the composite linkage disequilibrium coefficient.

Authors:  Dmitri V Zaykin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Linkage disequilibrium testing when linkage phase is unknown.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Effect of two- and three-locus linkage disequilibrium on the power to detect marker/phenotype associations.

Authors:  Dahlia M Nielsen; Margaret G Ehm; Dmitri V Zaykin; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.

Authors:  H Zhao; D Nettleton; M Soller; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  H Zhao; D Nettleton; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 9.  Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  28 in total

1.  Exploiting Linkage Disequilibrium for Ultrahigh-Dimensional Genome-Wide Data with an Integrated Statistical Approach.

Authors:  Michelle Carlsen; Guifang Fu; Shaun Bushman; Christopher Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Novel measures of linkage disequilibrium that correct the bias due to population structure and relatedness.

Authors:  B Mangin; A Siberchicot; S Nicolas; A Doligez; P This; C Cierco-Ayrolles
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Transition from Environmental to Partial Genetic Sex Determination in Daphnia through the Evolution of a Female-Determining Incipient W Chromosome.

Authors:  Céline M O Reisser; Dominique Fasel; Evelin Hürlimann; Marinela Dukic; Cathy Haag-Liautard; Virginie Thuillier; Yan Galimov; Christoph R Haag
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Population genetic structure of sexual and parthenogenetic damselflies inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear markers.

Authors:  M O Lorenzo-Carballa; H Hadrys; A Cordero-Rivera; J A Andrés
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Association of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene variants with acute lung injury in African American children with pneumonia*.

Authors:  Julie M Baughn; Michael W Quasney; Pippa Simpson; Daniel Merchant; Shun-Hwa Li; Hara Levy; Mary K Dahmer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Mutations in the neverland gene turned Drosophila pachea into an obligate specialist species.

Authors:  Michael Lang; Sophie Murat; Andrew G Clark; Géraldine Gouppil; Catherine Blais; Luciano M Matzkin; Emilie Guittard; Takuji Yoshiyama-Yanagawa; Hiroshi Kataoka; Ryusuke Niwa; René Lafont; Chantal Dauphin-Villemant; Virginie Orgogozo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Clustered Mutations at the Murine and Human IgH Locus Exhibit Significant Linkage Consistent with Templated Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Gordon A Dale; Daniel J Wilkins; Caitlin D Bohannon; Dario Dilernia; Eric Hunter; Trevor Bedford; Rustom Antia; Ignacio Sanz; Joshy Jacob
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Genetic differential sensitivity to social environments: implications for research.

Authors:  Colter Mitchell; Sara McLanahan; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn; Irwin Garfinkel; John Hobcraft; Daniel Notterman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry.

Authors:  Mathieu Joron; Lise Frezal; Robert T Jones; Nicola L Chamberlain; Siu F Lee; Christoph R Haag; Annabel Whibley; Michel Becuwe; Simon W Baxter; Laura Ferguson; Paul A Wilkinson; Camilo Salazar; Claire Davidson; Richard Clark; Michael A Quail; Helen Beasley; Rebecca Glithero; Christine Lloyd; Sarah Sims; Matthew C Jones; Jane Rogers; Chris D Jiggins; Richard H ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary N e using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Chi Do
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.