Literature DB >> 16181525

Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.

H Zhao1, D Nettleton, M Soller, J C M Dekkers.   

Abstract

Effectiveness of marker-assisted selection (MAS) and quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping using population-wide linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and QTL depends on the extent of LD and how it declines with distance in a population. Because marker-QTL LD cannot be observed directly, the objective of this study was to evaluate alternative measures of observable LD between multi-allelic markers as predictors of usable LD of multi-allelic markers with presumed biallelic QTL. Observable LD between marker pairs was evaluated using eight existing measures and one new measure. These consisted of two pooled and standardized measures of LD between pairs of alleles at two markers based on Lewontin's LD measure, two pooled measures of squared correlations between alleles, one standardized measure using Hardy-Weinberg heterozygosities, and four measures based on the chi-square statistic for testing for association between alleles at two loci. In simulated populations with a range of LD generated by drift and a range of marker polymorphism, marker-marker LD measured by a standardized chi-square statistic (denoted chi(2')) was found to be the best predictor of useable marker-QTL LD for a group of multi-allelic markers. Estimates of the level and decline of marker-marker LD with distance obtained from chi(2') were linearly and highly correlated with usable LD of those markers with QTL across population structures and marker polymorphism. Corresponding relationships were poorer for the other marker-marker LD measures. Therefore, when LD is generated by drift, chi(2') is recommended to quantify the amount and extent of usable LD in a population for QTL mapping and MAS based on multi-allelic markers.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181525     DOI: 10.1017/S001667230500769X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  45 in total

1.  A two-stage approximation for analysis of mixture genetic models in large pedigrees.

Authors:  D Habier; L R Totir; R L Fernando
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Association weight matrix for the genetic dissection of puberty in beef cattle.

Authors:  Marina R S Fortes; Antonio Reverter; Yuandan Zhang; Eliza Collis; Shivashankar H Nagaraj; Nick N Jonsson; Kishore C Prayaga; Wes Barris; Rachel J Hawken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Extent and consistency across generations of linkage disequilibrium in commercial layer chicken breeding populations.

Authors:  E M Heifetz; J E Fulton; N O'Sullivan; H Zhao; J C M Dekkers; M Soller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Power and precision of alternate methods for linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  H H Zhao; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Extensive long-range and nonsyntenic linkage disequilibrium in livestock populations: deconstruction of a conundrum.

Authors:  E Lipkin; K Straus; R Tal Stein; A Bagnato; F Schiavini; L Fontanesi; V Russo; I Medugorac; M Foerster; J Sölkner; M Dolezal; J F Medrano; A Friedmann; M Soller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Correlation-based inference for linkage disequilibrium with multiple alleles.

Authors:  Dmitri V Zaykin; Alexander Pudovkin; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  BanI/D13S141/D13S175 represents a novel informative haplotype at the GJB2 gene region in the Iranian population.

Authors:  Halimeh Rezaei; Sadeq Vallian
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.046

8.  Contribution of an additive locus to genetic variance when inheritance is multi-factorial with implications on interpretation of GWAS.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Frederic Hospital; Etienne Verrier
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Prediction of haplotypes for ungenotyped animals and its effect on marker-assisted breeding value estimation.

Authors:  Han A Mulder; Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Performance of single nucleotide polymorphisms versus haplotypes for genome-wide association analysis in barley.

Authors:  Aaron J Lorenz; Martha T Hamblin; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.