Literature DB >> 18757168

In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty. A review of 10 retrieved components.

Wolf-Christoph Witzleb1, Uwe Hanisch, Joerg Ziegler, Klaus-Peter Guenther.   

Abstract

The wear of 8 femoral and 2 acetabular components of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (Midland Medical Technologies Ltd, Birmingham, UK) was measured using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM5; SIP, Geneva, Switzerland). After a median in situ time of 13 months, measurements of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral heads revealed a median volumetric wear of 2.9 mm(3). In one case with a cup abduction angle of 70 degrees , a significantly higher wear of 17.8 mm(3) was found. The 2 acetabular components showed volumetric wear of 5.4 and 27.6 mm(3) after 14 and 15 months in vivo. The wear rates of the investigated femoral components were somewhat, but not significantly, higher than the previously investigated 28-mm Metasul heads (median, 0.8 mm(3); Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757168     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surgical variables influence metal ion levels after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Nicholas M Desy; Stephane G Bergeron; Alain Petit; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Five Hundred Fifty-five Retrieved Metal-on-metal Hip Replacements of a Single Design Show a Wide Range of Wear, Surface Features, and Histopathologic Reactions.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Park; Zhen Lu; Robert S Hastings; Patricia A Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Pseudotumors are common in well-positioned low-wearing metal-on-metal hips.

Authors:  Ashley K Matthies; John A Skinner; Humza Osmani; Johann Henckel; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Do retrieval analysis and blood metal measurements contribute to our understanding of adverse local tissue reactions?

Authors:  Patricia A Campbell; Michael S Kung; Andrew R Hsu; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A simulator study of adverse wear with metal and cement debris contamination in metal-on-metal hip bearings.

Authors:  T Halim; I C Clarke; M D Burgett-Moreno; T K Donaldson; C Savisaar; J G Bowsher
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 8.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients younger than 50 years: a retrospective analysis : 1285 cases, 12-year survivorship.

Authors:  Melissa D Gaillard; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Practical considerations for volumetric wear analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  D J Langton; R P Sidaginamale; J P Holland; D Deehan; T J Joyce; A V F Nargol; R D Meek; J K Lord
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.