Literature DB >> 18754097

[Cellular mechanisms of tumor response: clinical demands].

M-K Ganten1, M A Weber, T M Ganten.   

Abstract

Diseases caused by cancer have become more common due to an increase in life-expectation, but the probability of reaching an old age with or without a tumor disease is still increasing. According to the statistics of the German Cancer register, at present more than half of cancer patients survive for at least 5 years after cancer has been diagnosed. Many tumors can be cured using innovative neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy regimes, but the options for palliative therapy have also been improved. This leads to an increasing importance of the evaluation of the tumor response using imaging techniques. Classically, tumor response is measured by imaging using the RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) criteria, which define the changes in size of the tumor during therapy. However, there is increasingly more evidence that RECIST as the only measure of tumor response, does not document tumor response for all tumor entities and especially not for many medications known as targeted therapy. This article gives a review of the principles and mode of effect of various therapy regimes as well as the clinical demands on imaging techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18754097     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1739-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  27 in total

Review 1.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group.

Authors:  B D Cheson; S J Horning; B Coiffier; M A Shipp; R I Fisher; J M Connors; T A Lister; J Vose; A Grillo-López; A Hagenbeek; F Cabanillas; D Klippensten; W Hiddemann; R Castellino; N L Harris; J O Armitage; W Carter; R Hoppe; G P Canellos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  From bench to clinic with apoptosis-based therapeutic agents.

Authors:  D W Nicholson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Precision of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small solid pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs.

Authors:  H Bolte; C Riedel; C Riede; S Müller-Hülsbeck; S Freitag-Wolf; G Kohl; T Drews; M Heller; J Biederer; J Bieder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; John M Hoffman; Bruce Johnson; Howard I Scher; Barry A Siegel; Edward Y Cheng; Bruce D Cheson; Joyce O'shaughnessy; Kathryn Z Guyton; David A Mankoff; Lalitha Shankar; Steven M Larson; Caroline C Sigman; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT scan-based study.

Authors:  M Werner-Wasik; Y Xiao; E Pequignot; W J Curran; W Hauck
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  The promise of TRAIL--potential and risks of a novel anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Ronald Koschny; Henning Walczak; Tom M Ganten
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 8.  Critical issues in response evaluation on computed tomography: lessons from the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model.

Authors:  Haesun Choi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Sorafenib: in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Non-invasive assessment of vessel morphology and function in tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Manfred Jugold; Eva C Woenne; Gunnar Brix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Response criteria for malignant lymphoma].

Authors:  M K Ganten
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.