Literature DB >> 18752610

Faster fertilization rate in conspecific versus heterospecific matings in house mice.

Matthew D Dean1, Michael W Nachman.   

Abstract

Barriers to gene flow can arise at any stage in the reproductive sequence. Most studies of reproductive isolation focus on premating or postzygotic phenotypes, leaving the importance of differences in fertilization rate overlooked. Two closely related species of house mice, Mus domesticus and M. musculus, form a narrow hybrid zone in Europe, suggesting that one or more isolating factors operate in the face of ongoing gene flow. Here, we test for differences in fertilization rate using laboratory matings as well as in vitro sperm competition assays. In noncompetitive matings, we show that fertilization occurs significantly faster in conspecific versus heterospecific matings and that this difference arises after mating and before zygotes form. To further explore the mechanisms underlying this conspecific advantage, we used competitive in vitro assays to isolate gamete interactions. Surprisingly, we discovered that M. musculus sperm consistently outcompeted M. domesticus sperm regardless of which species donated ova. These results suggest that in vivo fertilization rate is mediated by interactions between sperm, the internal female environment, and/or contributions from male seminal fluid. We discuss the implications of faster conspecific fertilization in terms of reproductive isolation among these two naturally hybridizing species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18752610      PMCID: PMC2908291          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00499.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  73 in total

1.  A seminal vesicle autoantigen of mouse is able to suppress sperm capacitation-related events stimulated by serum albumin.

Authors:  Y H Huang; S T Chu; Y H Chen
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Nontransitivity of sperm precedence in Drosophila.

Authors:  A G Clark; E T Dermitzakis; A Civetta
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila.

Authors:  L L Knowles; T A Markow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins.

Authors:  Willie J Swanson; Victor D Vacquier
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Postcopulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Timothy R Birkhead; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man.

Authors:  G J Wyckoff; W Wang; C I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Effect of antibodies against seminal vesicle secretion on fertility in the rat.

Authors:  R Carballada; P Esponda
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.442

8.  Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex.

Authors:  C S Price; C H Kim; C J Gronlund; J A Coyne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Species-specific sperm-egg interaction affects the utility of a heterologous bovine in vitro fertilization system for evaluating antelope sperm.

Authors:  A J Kouba; M W Atkinson; A R Gandolf; T L Roth
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  In vitro production of cattle-water buffalo (Bos taurus--Bubalus bubalis) hybrid embryos.

Authors:  H P S Kochhar; K B C Appa Rao; A M Luciano; S M Totey; F Gandolfi; P K Basrur; W A King
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.442

View more
  20 in total

1.  Genetic dissection of a key reproductive barrier between nascent species of house mice.

Authors:  Michael A White; Brian Steffy; Tim Wiltshire; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sperm competition risk generates phenotypic plasticity in ovum fertilizability.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Genetic and phenotypic influences on copulatory plug survival in mice.

Authors:  R Mangels; B Young; S Keeble; R Ardekani; C Meslin; Z Ferreira; N L Clark; J M Good; M D Dean
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Copulatory plugs inhibit the reproductive success of rival males.

Authors:  Rachel Mangels; Kathleen Tsung; Kelly Kwan; Matthew D Dean
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Sexual selection against natural hybrids may contribute to reinforcement in a house mouse hybrid zone.

Authors:  Yasmin Latour; Marco Perriat-Sanguinet; Pierre Caminade; Pierre Boursot; Carole M Smadja; Guila Ganem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Asymmetrical conspecific seed-siring advantage between Silene latifolia and S. dioica.

Authors:  Benjamin R Montgomery; Deanna M Soper; Lynda F Delph
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Genetics and evolution of hybrid male sterility in house mice.

Authors:  Michael A White; Maria Stubbings; Beth L Dumont; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Proteomics and comparative genomic investigations reveal heterogeneity in evolutionary rate of male reproductive proteins in mice (Mus domesticus).

Authors:  Matthew D Dean; Nathaniel L Clark; Geoffrey D Findlay; Robert C Karn; Xianhua Yi; Willie J Swanson; Michael J MacCoss; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus.

Authors:  Václav Janoušek; Liuyang Wang; Ken Luzynski; Petra Dufková; Martina M Vyskočilová; Michael W Nachman; Pavel Munclinger; Miloš Macholán; Jaroslav Piálek; Priscilla K Tucker
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Mate choice in Mus musculus is relative and dependent on the estrous state.

Authors:  Léa Zinck; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.