Literature DB >> 20147372

Asymmetrical conspecific seed-siring advantage between Silene latifolia and S. dioica.

Benjamin R Montgomery1, Deanna M Soper, Lynda F Delph.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Silene dioica and S. latifolia experience only limited introgression despite overlapping flowering phenologies, geographical distributions, and some pollinator sharing. Conspecific pollen precedence and other reproductive barriers operating between pollination and seed germination may limit hybridization. This study investigates whether barriers at this stage contribute to reproductive isolation between these species and, if so, which mechanisms are responsible.
METHODS: Pollen-tube lengths for pollen of both species in styles of both species were compared. Additionally, both species were pollinated with majority S. latifolia and majority S. dioica pollen mixes; then seed set, seed germination rates and hybridity of the resulting seedlings were determined using species-specific molecular markers. KEY
RESULTS: The longest pollen tubes were significantly longer for conspecific than heterospecific pollen in both species, indicating conspecific pollen precedence. Seed set but not seed germination was lower for flowers pollinated with pure heterospecific versus pure conspecific pollen. Mixed-species pollinations resulted in disproportionately high representation of nonhybrid offspring for pollinations of S. latifolia but not S. dioica flowers.
CONCLUSIONS: The finding of conspecific pollen precedence for pollen-tube growth but not seed siring in S. dioica flowers may be explained by variation in pollen-tube growth rates, either at different locations in the style or between leading and trailing pollen tubes. Additionally, this study finds a barrier to hybridization operating between pollination and seed germination against S. dioica but not S. latifolia pollen. The results are consistent with the underlying cause of this barrier being attrition of S. dioica pollen tubes or reduced success of heterospecifically fertilized ovules, rather than time-variant mechanisms. Post-pollination, pre-germination barriers to hybridization thus play a partial role in limiting introgression between these species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20147372      PMCID: PMC2850797          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  19 in total

1.  Absence of conspecific pollen advantage in the dynamics of an Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrid zone.

Authors:  R Alarcón; D R Campbell
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium.

Authors:  Brian C Husband; Douglas W Schemske; Tracy L Burton; Carol Goodwillie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms.

Authors:  V GRANT
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Systematics of Euromediterranean Silene (Caryophyllaceae): evidence from a phylogenetic analysis using ITS sequences.

Authors:  C Desfeux; B Lejeune
Journal:  C R Acad Sci III       Date:  1996-04

5.  Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  T Hauser; R Jorgensen; H Ostergard
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Tests of pre- and postpollination barriers to hybridization between sympatric species of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae).

Authors:  P G Wolf; D R Campbell; N M Waser; S D Sipes; T R Toler; J K Archibald
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Pollen competition as a reproductive isolating mechanism between two sympatric Hibiscus species.

Authors:  R A Klips
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Differences in pollen-tube growth rate and reproductive isolation between Louisiana irises.

Authors:  S E Carney; M L Arnold
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Reproductive isolation and hybrid pollen disadvantage in Ipomopsis.

Authors:  D R Campbell; R Alarcón; C A Wu
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Post-pollination mechanisms in Nicotiana longiflora and N. plumbaginifolia: pollen tube growth rate, offspring paternity and hybridization.

Authors:  Dulce M Figueroa-Castro; Timothy P Holtsford
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2009-07-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Unidirectional hybridization and reproductive barriers between two heterostylous primrose species in north-west Yunnan, China.

Authors:  Yongpeng Ma; Weijia Xie; Xiaoling Tian; Weibang Sun; Zhikun Wu; Richard Milne
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  X linkage of AP3A, a homolog of the Y-linked MADS-box gene AP3Y in Silene latifolia and S. dioica.

Authors:  Rebecca H Penny; Benjamin R Montgomery; Lynda F Delph
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evidence for asymmetrical hybridization despite pre- and post-pollination reproductive barriers between two Silene species.

Authors:  Jin-Ju Zhang; Benjamin R Montgomery; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Modest enhancements to conventional grassland diversity improve the provision of pollination services.

Authors:  Katherine A Orford; Phil J Murray; Ian P Vaughan; Jane Memmott
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 6.528

5.  Conspecific pollen advantage mediated by the extragynoecial compitum and its potential to resist interspecific reproductive interference between two Sagittaria species.

Authors:  Cai-Hong Fei; Sha-Sha Tang; Shu-He Shang; Jie Dai; Xin-Yi Wang; Shuai Wang; Wei-Qi Liu; Xiao-Fan Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Pollen competition in hybridizing Cakile species: How does a latecomer win the race?

Authors:  Tara Jalali; Hanna S Rosinger; Kathryn A Hodgins; Alexandre J Fournier-Level
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Differences in style length confer prezygotic isolation between two dioecious species of Silene in sympatry.

Authors:  Phil Nista; Amanda N Brothers; Lynda F Delph
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Parental genetic distance and patterns in nonrandom mating and seed yield in predominately selfing Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ann L Carlson; Hui Gong; Christopher Toomajian; Robert J Swanson
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.767

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.