Literature DB >> 14706323

Structural behavior of human lumbar spinal motion segments.

Mack G Gardner-Morse1, Ian A F Stokes.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to obtain linearized stiffness matrices, and assess the linearity and hysteresis of the motion segments of the human lumbar spine under physiological conditions of axial preload and fluid environment. Also, the stiffness matrices were expressed in the form of an 'equivalent' structure that would give insights into the structural behavior of the spine. Mechanical properties of human cadaveric lumbar L2-3 and L4-5 spinal motion segments were measured in six degrees of freedom by recording forces when each of six principal displacements was applied. Each specimen was tested with axial compressive preloads of 0, 250 and 500 N. The displacements were four slow cycles of +/-0.5mm in anterior-posterior and lateral displacements, +/-0.35 mm axial displacement, +/-1.5 degrees lateral rotation and +/-1 degrees flexion-extension and torsional rotations. There were significant increases with magnitude of preload in the stiffness, hysteresis area (but not loss coefficient) and the linearity of the load-displacement relationship. The mean values of the diagonal and primary off-diagonal stiffness terms for intact motion segments increased significantly relative to values with no preload by an average factor of 1.71 and 2.11 with 250 and 500 N preload, respectively (all eight tests p<0.01). Half of the stiffness terms were greater at L4-5 than L2-3 at higher preloads. The linearized stiffness matrices at each preload magnitude were expressed as an equivalent structure consisting of a truss and a beam with a rigid posterior offset, whose geometrical properties varied with preload. These stiffness properties can be used in structural analyses of the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706323     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  30 in total

1.  Biomechanical Comparison of Robotically Applied Pure Moment, Ideal Follower Load, and Novel Trunk Weight Loading Protocols on L4-L5 Cadaveric Segments during Flexion-Extension.

Authors:  Charles R Bennett; Denis J DiAngelo; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model-Method and Performance in Flexed Postures.

Authors:  Xiangjie Meng; Alexander G Bruno; Bo Cheng; Wenjun Wang; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Design Requirements for Annulus Fibrosus Repair: Review of Forces, Displacements, and Material Properties of the Intervertebral Disk and a Summary of Candidate Hydrogels for Repair.

Authors:  Rose G Long; Olivia M Torre; Warren W Hom; Dylan J Assael; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Dynamics of an intervertebral disc prosthesis in human cadaveric spines.

Authors:  Kathleen N Meyers; Deirdre A Campbell; Joseph D Lipman; Kai Zhang; Elizabeth R Myers; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

6.  Differences in perfusion parameters between upper and lower lumbar vertebral segments with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI).

Authors:  Vasiliki Savvopoulou; Thomas G Maris; Lampros Vlahos; Lia Angela Moulopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A database of lumbar spinal mechanical behavior for validation of spinal analytical models.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Mack Gardner-Morse
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Biomechanical test protocols to detect minor injury effects in intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Olivia M Torre; Thomas W Evashwick-Rogler; Phillip Nasser; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-03-29

9.  A new method to approximate load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments for patient-specific multi-body models of scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Athena Jalalian; Francis E H Tay; Soheil Arastehfar; Gabriel Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; John Street; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ian Stavness; Marcel Dvorak; Sidney Fels; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.