Kimberly P Truesdale1, June Stevens. 1. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , USA. kim_truesdale@unc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether adults accurately perceived their weight status category and could report how much they would need to weigh in order to be classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Height and weight were measured on 104 White and African American men and women 45 to 64 years of age living in North Carolina. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each participant, and participants were classified as underweight (< 18.5), normal weight (> or = 18.5 to < 25.0), overweight (> or = 25.0 to < 30.0), or obese (> or = 30.0). Participants self-reported their weight status category and how much they would have to weigh to be classified in each weight status category. RESULTS: Only 22.2% of obese women and 6.7% of obese men correctly classified themselves as obese (weighted kappa: 0.45 in women and 0.31 in men). On average, normal weight women and men were reasonably accurate in their assessment of how much they would need to weigh to be classified as obese; however, obese women and men overestimated the amount. Normal weight women thought they would be obese with a BMI of 28.9 kg/m2, while obese women thought they would be obese with a BMI of 38.2 kg/m2. The estimates were 30.2 kg/m2 and 34.5 kg/m2 for normal weight and obese men, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was small and was not selected to be representative of North Carolina residents. DISCUSSION: Obese adults' inability to correctly classify themselves as obese may result in ignoring health messages about obesity and lack of motivation to reduce weight.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether adults accurately perceived their weight status category and could report how much they would need to weigh in order to be classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Height and weight were measured on 104 White and African American men and women 45 to 64 years of age living in North Carolina. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each participant, and participants were classified as underweight (< 18.5), normal weight (> or = 18.5 to < 25.0), overweight (> or = 25.0 to < 30.0), or obese (> or = 30.0). Participants self-reported their weight status category and how much they would have to weigh to be classified in each weight status category. RESULTS: Only 22.2% of obesewomen and 6.7% of obesemen correctly classified themselves as obese (weighted kappa: 0.45 in women and 0.31 in men). On average, normal weight women and men were reasonably accurate in their assessment of how much they would need to weigh to be classified as obese; however, obesewomen and men overestimated the amount. Normal weight women thought they would be obese with a BMI of 28.9 kg/m2, while obesewomen thought they would be obese with a BMI of 38.2 kg/m2. The estimates were 30.2 kg/m2 and 34.5 kg/m2 for normal weight and obesemen, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was small and was not selected to be representative of North Carolina residents. DISCUSSION: Obese adults' inability to correctly classify themselves as obese may result in ignoring health messages about obesity and lack of motivation to reduce weight.
Authors: Gary G Bennett; Kathleen Y Wolin; Melody Goodman; Michelle Samplin-Salgado; Patricia Carter; Sarah Dutton; Retha Hill; Karen Emmons Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Philip Gerretsen; Julia Kim; Parita Shah; Lena Quilty; Thushanthi Balakumar; Fernando Caravaggio; Eric Plitman; Jun Ku Chung; Yusuke Iwata; Bruce G Pollock; Satya Dash; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Ariel Graff-Guerrero Journal: Obes Med Date: 2018-02-12
Authors: Susan Darlow; Melody S Goodman; Jewel D Stafford; Christina R Lachance; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 2.830