Literature DB >> 30505975

OASIS: The Obesity Awareness and Insight Scale.

Philip Gerretsen1,2,3,4,5, Julia Kim1,2, Parita Shah1,2, Lena Quilty2,5, Thushanthi Balakumar1, Fernando Caravaggio1,3, Eric Plitman1,2, Jun Ku Chung1,2, Yusuke Iwata1,3, Bruce G Pollock1,2,3,4,5, Satya Dash6, Sanjeev Sockalingam2,6, Ariel Graff-Guerrero1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

AIMS: Impaired illness awareness or not accepting that one has obesity is an understudied phenomenon that may negatively influence treatment adherence and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of available measures of obesity awareness, and subsequently develop and validate a novel scale that measures the core domains of obesity awareness.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature revealed no illness specific measure of subjective obesity awareness. As such, we designed the Obesity Awareness and Insight Scale (OASIS) to assess the following core domains of illness awareness: General Illness Awareness,, Symptom Attribution,, Awareness of Need for Treatment and the Negative Consequences attributable to the illness (www.illnessawarenessscales.com). Participants (n=100) were recruited from an online survey platform to assess the psychometric properties of OASIS.
RESULTS: The OASIS demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.89), convergent (r(98)=0.65, p<0.001) and discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation=0.76). An exploratory factor analysis of OASIS revealed a single latent component.
CONCLUSIONS: OASIS is an obesity-specific instrument that comprehensively measures subjective obesity awareness. OASIS can be used in epidemiological studies, intervention trials and clinical practice to assess the impact of obesity awareness on treatment adherence and outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Illness awareness; illness denial; insight into illness; obese; obesity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505975      PMCID: PMC6260590          DOI: 10.1016/j.obmed.2018.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Med        ISSN: 2451-8476


  33 in total

1.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.

Authors:  C C Preston; A M Colman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2000-03

2.  A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Alia Menezes; Lois Horovitz; Edward C Jones; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The brief illness perception questionnaire.

Authors:  Elizabeth Broadbent; Keith J Petrie; Jodie Main; John Weinman
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Self-reported comorbidities among self-described overweight African-American and Hispanic adults in the United States: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Valentine J Burroughs; Cathy Nonas; Christine T Sweeney; Jeffrey M Rohay; Andrea M Harkins; Theodore K Kyle; Steven L Burton
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Trends in overweight and misperceived overweight in Spain from 1987 to 2007.

Authors:  V Salcedo; J L Gutiérrez-Fisac; P Guallar-Castillón; F Rodríguez-Artalejo
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Assessing and improving clinical insight among patients "in denial".

Authors:  Arthur Robin Williams; Mark Olfson; Marc Galanter
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.596

7.  The change in weight perception of weight status among the overweight: comparison of NHANES III (1988-1994) and 1999-2004 NHANES.

Authors:  Wendy L Johnson-Taylor; Rachel A Fisher; Van S Hubbard; Pamela Starke-Reed; Paul S Eggers
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Comparison of perceptions of obesity among adults with central obesity with and without additional cardiometabolic risk factors and among those who were formally obese, 3 years after screening for central obesity.

Authors:  Corine den Engelsen; Rimke C Vos; Mieke Rijken; Guy E H M Rutten
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Do weight perceptions among obese adults in Great Britain match clinical definitions? Analysis of cross-sectional surveys from 2007 and 2012.

Authors:  Fiona Johnson; Rebecca J Beeken; Helen Croker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Population-based survey of overweight and obesity and the associated factors in peri-urban and rural Eastern Uganda.

Authors:  Barbara Eva Kirunda; Lars Thore Fadnes; Henry Wamani; Jan Van den Broeck; Thorkild Tylleskär
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Measure of Illness Awareness in Individuals With Nicotine Dependence-Nicotine Use Awareness and Insight Scale.

Authors:  Julia Kim; Yasaman Kambari; Anmol Taggar; Lena C Quilty; Peter Selby; Fernando Caravaggio; Fumihiko Ueno; Jianmeng Song; Bruce G Pollock; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Philip Gerretsen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Cognitive insight is associated with perceived body weight in overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  Sharain Suliman; Leigh L van den Heuvel; Sanja Kilian; Erine Bröcker; Laila Asmal; Robin Emsley; Soraya Seedat
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.