Literature DB >> 1872231

The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.

R McLelland1, R E Hendrick, M D Zinninger, P A Wilcox.   

Abstract

This article discusses the background, goals, criteria, current results, impact, and future directions of the American College of Radiology's (ACR's) Mammography Accreditation Program. To date, approximately one half of the mammographic units in the United States have voluntarily applied for accreditation through the ACR program, with approximately one quarter of the units in the United States now accredited. Application rates have increased steadily since the start of the program in August 1987. The equipment performance criteria and professional criteria defined and employed in the ACR Mammography Accreditation Program have been adopted as standards for the performance of screening mammography by the ACR and have served as a basis for quality assurance standards in state and federal legislation on mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1872231     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.157.3.1872231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

1.  Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.

Authors:  H Roehrig; C E Willis; M A Damento
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.

Authors:  C Klabunde; F Bouchard; S Taplin; A Scharpantgen; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Impact of the Mammography Quality Standards Act on access in Minnesota.

Authors:  J E Korn; A Casey-Paal; D Lazovich; J Ball; J S Slater
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Advances in breast cancer detection with screening mammography.

Authors:  J L Champaign; G J Cederbom
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2000-01

5.  Image quality control for digital mammographic systems: initial experience and outlook.

Authors:  H Roehrig; T Yu; E Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Accredited mammography units.

Authors:  L Hutton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Three-dimensionally-printed anthropomorphic physical phantom for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis with custom materials, lesions, and uniform quality control region.

Authors:  Andrea H Rossman; Matthew Catenacci; Christine Zhao; Dhiraj Sikaria; John E Knudsen; Danielle Dawes; Michael E Gehm; Ehsan Samei; Benjamin J Wiley; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-03-22

8.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Quality care and safety know no borders.

Authors:  Jp Borgstede; Pa Wilcox
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-07-01

10.  Clinical image evaluation of film mammograms in Korea: comparison with the ACR standard.

Authors:  Yeon Joo Gwak; Hye Jung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son; Kyung Hee Ko; Jin Hwa Lee; Hyo Soon Lim; You Jin Lee; Ji Won Park; Kyung Min Shin; Yun-Jin Jang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.