Literature DB >> 9071276

Impact of the Mammography Quality Standards Act on access in Minnesota.

J E Korn1, A Casey-Paal, D Lazovich, J Ball, J S Slater.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Minnesota Department of Health surveyed registered mammography facilities to assess their accreditation status prior to full implementation of the Federal Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA), which mandated accreditation of all mammography facilities by October 1994; to strategize on the steps that might be taken to avoid closure of facilities; and to evaluate the ultimate impact of the law on the availability of mammography in Minnesota.
METHODS: Mammography facilities registered with the Radiation Control Section of the state health department were surveyed five months prior to and four months after the October 1994 deadline. Data collected included accreditation status, plans for continuing service, number of mammograms performed, and areas in which technical assistance was needed. In October 1995, the number and distribution of facilities were determined from the Radiation Control Section registration database.
RESULTS: The pre-MQSA survey of 182 respondents found that 96% planned to continue mammography services but only 49% were accredited. The remaining 51% had applications in progress. In the post-MQSA survey, 70% of 182 facilities were found to be accredited, and 30% were operating under provisional certification. As of October 1995, although six facilities had closed, there was a net gain of four mammography facilities providing on-site service.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite fears to the contrary, access to mammography in the state of Minnesota was not adversely affected by full implementation of the Mammography Quality Standards Act.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9071276      PMCID: PMC1381861     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  6 in total

1.  The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.

Authors:  R McLelland; R E Hendrick; M D Zinninger; P A Wilcox
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.

Authors:  L Fintor; M H Alciati; R Fischer
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.222

3.  The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992.

Authors:  F A Hoffman; P H Rheinstein; F Houn
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Deficiencies in the analysis of breast cancer screening data.

Authors:  E A Sickles; D B Kopans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Mammography quality assurance. Current issues.

Authors:  R E Hendrick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Mammography capacity and appointment wait times: barriers to breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Jacqueline G Snow; Nicole M Leoce; Coral L Atoria; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Geographic access and the use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Nicole M Ishill; Jacqueline G Snow; Katherine S Panageas; Peter B Bach; Laura Liberman; Fahui Wang; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.983

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.