Literature DB >> 18719971

Outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with developmental hip dysplasia.

Florian D Naal1, Matthias Schmied, Urs Munzinger, Michael Leunig, Otmar Hersche.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) typically are young and active, which might affect functional ratings or failure rates after resurfacing arthroplasty. We therefore evaluated 24 patients (32 hips; mean age, 44.2 years) after hip resurfacing performed for osteoarthritis secondary to DDH. We used the Harris hip score (HHS), the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, and a sports and activity questionnaire. A radiographic analysis also was performed. We followed patients a minimum of 28 months (mean, 43 months; range 28-60 months). The HHS improved from a mean of 54.7 to 97.3 and UCLA activity levels increased from a mean of 5.3 to 8.6. All patients returned to sports activity at a mean of 11 weeks after surface replacement. There were no major differences in preoperative and postoperative participation in the most common sports and activities. Two of the 32 replacements (6%) failed. We detected femoral radiolucencies in 10 of the remaining 30 hips. Despite satisfactory outcomes in clinical scores, return to sports, and hip biomechanics, the failure rate of 6% was disappointing. Additional followup is important to assess if failure rates increase in these young, active patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18719971      PMCID: PMC2674151          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0456-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Analysis of the gait of adults who had residua of congenital dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  C L Romanò; C Frigo; G Randelli; A Pedotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  J F Crowe; V J Mani; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  [Functional results after surface replacement of the hip: comparison between dysplasia and idiopathic osteoarthritis].

Authors:  A Knecht; W-C Witzleb; T Beichler; K-P Günther
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 May-Jun

7.  Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Pat A Campbell; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean-Noel A Argenson; Xavier Flecher; Sebastien Parratte; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Daniel; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Ronny Pilz; Urs Munzinger; Otmar Hersche; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Michael S H Kain; Otmar Hersche; Urs Munzinger; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Custom cementless stem improves hip function in young patients at 15-year followup.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Oliver Pearce; Sebastien Parratte; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Reducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases.

Authors:  Melissa D Gaillard; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Olli Lainiala; Petra Elo; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.