Literature DB >> 18718924

Optimising recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people: a randomised controlled trial of different approaches.

Tess J Harris1, Iain M Carey, Christina R Victor, Rika Adams, Derek G Cook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: physical activity studies in older people often have poor recruitment. Including a questionnaire with the invitation would provide information about non-participants and selection bias, but could reduce recruitment. Telephone contact might encourage participation.
OBJECTIVE: to test the effects of different strategies for recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people.
DESIGN: factorial randomised controlled trial. Randomisation by household into four groups: telephone contact plus questionnaire, telephone contact only, questionnaire only, neither.
SETTING: primary care, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 560 patients > or = 65 years randomly selected after exclusions.
INTERVENTIONS: questionnaire to assess health, functional ability and physical activity. Telephone contact by the research nurse a week after sending study information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: recruitment into physical activity study.
RESULTS: telephone contact increased recruitment: contact 47.9% (134/280), no contact 37.9% (106/280), difference (adjusted for the clustering effect of household) 10.0% (95% CI 0.2-19.8). Questionnaire inclusion did not significantly reduce recruitment: no questionnaire 44.3% (124/280) questionnaire 41.4% (116/280) difference -2.9% (95% CI -12.7-7.0).
CONCLUSIONS: telephone contact significantly increased recruitment and should be considered in studies where recruitment may be low. While inclusion of a questionnaire provided valuable information on non-participants and did not significantly reduce recruitment, an adverse recruitment effect could not be excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718924     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  23 in total

1.  Determining the reach of a home-based physical activity program for older adults within the context of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; Jason T Fanning; Robert W Motl; Edward McAuley; Paul A Estabrooks
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-08-13

Review 2.  Recruiting participants to walking intervention studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charlie E Foster; Graham Brennan; Anne Matthews; Chloe McAdam; Claire Fitzsimons; Nanette Mutrie
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  The challenge of recruiting multimorbid older patients identified in a hospital database to a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karol R Biegus; Richard B Frobell; Åsa K Wallin; Anne W Ekdahl
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Study participation rate of patients with acute spinal cord injury early during rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Krebs; A Katrin Brust; S Tesini; M Guler; G Mueller; I M Velstra; A Frotzler
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Lifestyle interventions and independence for elders study: recruitment and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Anthony P Marsh; Laura C Lovato; Nancy W Glynn; Kimberly Kennedy; Cynthia Castro; Kathryn Domanchuk; Erica McDavitt; Ruben Rodate; Michael Marsiske; Joanne McGloin; Erik J Groessl; Marco Pahor; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 6.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan Cook; Cynthia Fraser; Elizabeth Mitchell; Frank Sullivan; Catherine Jackson; Tyna K Taskila; Heidi Gardner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-22

7.  Feasibility of a home-based foot-ankle exercise programme for musculoskeletal dysfunctions in people with diabetes: randomised controlled FOotCAre (FOCA) Trial II.

Authors:  Érica Q Silva; Danilo P Santos; Raquel I Beteli; Renan L Monteiro; Jane S S P Ferreira; Ronaldo H Cruvinel-Junior; Asha Donini; Jady L Verissímo; Eneida Y Suda; Isabel C N Sacco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Pauline Lockhart; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan A Cook; Monica Kjeldstrøm; Marit Johansen; Taina K Taskila; Frank M Sullivan; Sue Wilson; Catherine Jackson; Ritu Jones; Elizabeth D Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.

Authors:  Tess Harris; Sally Kerry; Christina Victor; Ulf Ekelund; Alison Woodcock; Steve Iliffe; Peter Whincup; Carole Beighton; Michael Ussher; Lee David; Debbie Brewin; Fredrika Adams; Annabelle Rogers; Derek Cook
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Randomized controlled trial comparing telephone and mail follow-up for recruitment of participants into a clinical trial of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Arthur D Wong; John Kirby; Gordon H Guyatt; Paul Moayyedi; Parag Vora; John J You
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.