Literature DB >> 25917949

Study participation rate of patients with acute spinal cord injury early during rehabilitation.

J Krebs1, A Katrin Brust1, S Tesini1, M Guler1, G Mueller1, I M Velstra1, A Frotzler1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the study participation rate of patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) early during rehabilitation after conveying preliminary study information.
SETTING: Single SCI rehabilitation center in Switzerland.
METHODS: Newly admitted acute SCI patients receive a flyer to inform them concerning the purpose of clinical research, patient rights and active studies. Upon patient request, detailed study information is given. The rate of patients asking for detailed information (study interest) and the rate of study participation was evaluated from May 2013 to October 2014. Furthermore, the number of patients not withdrawing consent to the utilization of coded health-related data was determined.
RESULTS: The flyer was given to 144 of the 183 patients admitted during the observation period. A total of 96 patients (67%) were interested in receiving detailed information, and 71 patients (49%) finally participated in at least one study. The vast majority of patients (that is, 91%) did not withdraw consent for retrospective data analysis. An age over 60 years had a significantly (P⩽0.023) negative effect on study interest and participation, and the consent rate to retrospective data analysis was significantly (P<0.04) lower in patients older than 75 years. Study interest and participation were reduced more than 5 and 14-fold, respectively, in patients older than 60 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low (approximately 50%) study participation rates of acute SCI patients should be considered when planning clinical trials. The recruitment of patients older than 60 years may be reduced substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25917949     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  19 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial inclusion/exclusion criteria and ethics.

Authors:  M H Tuszynski; J D Steeves; J W Fawcett; D Lammertse; M Kalichman; C Rask; A Curt; J F Ditunno; M G Fehlings; J D Guest; P H Ellaway; N Kleitman; P F Bartlett; A R Blight; V Dietz; B H Dobkin; R Grossman; A Privat
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Prediction and stratification of upper limb function and self-care in acute cervical spinal cord injury with the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension (GRASSP).

Authors:  Inge-Marie Velstra; Marc Bolliger; Lorenzo Giuseppe Tanadini; Michael Baumberger; Rainer Abel; Johan S Rietman; Armin Curt
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Does an HIV clinical trial information booklet improve patient knowledge and understanding of HIV clinical trials?

Authors:  N J Ives; M Troop; A Waters; S Davies; C Higgs; P J Easterbrook
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.180

4.  Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology, and functional outcome.

Authors:  W O McKinley; R T Seel; J T Hardman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Overcoming recruitment challenges in patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from an Italian survey.

Authors:  Simona Maida; Gloria Dalla Costa; Mariaemma Rodegher; Monica Falautano; Giancarlo Comi; Vittorio Martinelli
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  The changing demographics of traumatic spinal cord injury: An 11-year study of 831 patients.

Authors:  Cynthia Thompson; Jennifer Mutch; Stefan Parent; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Feasibility of patient recruitment into clinical trials of experimental treatments for acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Robert S Lee; Vanessa K Noonan; Juliet Batke; Arvindera Ghag; Scott J Paquette; Michael C Boyd; Charles G Fisher; John Street; Marcel F Dvorak; Brian K Kwon
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Optimising recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people: a randomised controlled trial of different approaches.

Authors:  Tess J Harris; Iain M Carey; Christina R Victor; Rika Adams; Derek G Cook
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.

Authors:  Alison M McDonald; Rosemary C Knight; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Adrian M Grant; Jonathan A Cook; Diana R Elbourne; David Francis; Jo Garcia; Ian Roberts; Claire Snowdon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Pauline Lockhart; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan A Cook; Monica Kjeldstrøm; Marit Johansen; Taina K Taskila; Frank M Sullivan; Sue Wilson; Catherine Jackson; Ritu Jones; Elizabeth D Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of recruitment for neurotherapeutic clinical trials in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew R Blight; Jane Hsieh; Armin Curt; James W Fawcett; James D Guest; Naomi Kleitman; Shekar N Kurpad; Brian K Kwon; Daniel P Lammertse; Norbert Weidner; John D Steeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.