Literature DB >> 18716359

Difference between home and office blood pressures among treated hypertensive patients from the Japan Home versus Office Blood Pressure Measurement Evaluation (J-HOME) study.

Tsuyoshi Horikawa1, Taku Obara, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Kei Asayama, Hirohito Metoki, Ryusuke Inoue, Masahiro Kikuya, Junichiro Hashimoto, Kazuhito Totsune, Yutaka Imai.   

Abstract

This study sought to clarify the factors associated with the magnitude of the difference between home and office blood pressures in treated hypertensive patients. Study subjects consisted of 3,308 essential hypertensive patients (mean age, 66 years; males, 44%) receiving antihypertensive treatment in primary care settings in Japan. Patients were classified into 3 groups (the home effect group, small difference group, and office effect group) according to tertiles of the magnitude of the office-home systolic blood pressure difference. Compared to the other two groups, the home effect group patients were significantly and independently older, were more often habitual drinkers, had a greater family history of cerebrovascular disease or personal history of ischemic heart disease, and were prescribed a greater number of antihypertensive drugs, non-amlodipine calcium channel blockers, and alpha-blockers as antihypertensive drugs. Compared to the other two groups, the office effect group patients were significantly and independently younger, included more females, less frequently had a family history of cerebrovascular disease or personal history of ischemic heart disease, and were less often prescribed alpha-blockers as antihypertensive drugs. The characteristics of home effect group patients and the factors negatively affecting the blood pressure difference were the same. Among treated hypertensive patients, compared to patients in the other groups, office effect group patients had a lower-risk profile, whereas home effect group patients had a higher-risk profile. These predictive factors might be useful clinically to help identify patients who may have a large difference between home and office blood pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716359     DOI: 10.1291/hypres.31.1115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  4 in total

1.  Parity as a factor affecting the white-coat effect in pregnant women: the BOSHI study.

Authors:  Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Hirohito Metoki; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Noriyuki Iwama; Mikiko Katagiri; Hidekazu Nishigori; Yoko Narikawa; Katsuyo Yagihashi; Masahiro Kikuya; Nobuo Yaegashi; Kazuhiko Hoshi; Masakuni Suzuki; Shinichi Kuriyama; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Comparison among research, home, and office blood pressure measurements for pregnant women: The TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

Authors:  Takuma Usuzaki; Mami Ishikuro; Hirohito Metoki; Keiko Murakami; Aoi Noda; Fumihiko Ueno; Masahiro Kikuya; Taku Obara; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Home and Office Blood Pressure Control among Treated Hypertensive Patients in Japan: Findings from the Japan Home versus Office Blood Pressure Measurement Evaluation (J-HOME) Study.

Authors:  Taku Obara; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Michihiro Satoh; Nariyasu Mano; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-02-04

4.  Differences between clinic blood pressure and morning home blood pressure, as shown by Bland-Altman plots, in a large observational study (HONEST study).

Authors:  Kazuyuki Shimada; Kazuomi Kario; Toshio Kushiro; Satoshi Teramukai; Yusuke Ishikawa; Fumiaki Kobayashi; Ikuo Saito
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.872

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.