Literature DB >> 18712583

Management of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Ryan M Garcia1, Matthew J Kraay, Patricia A Conroy-Smith, Victor M Goldberg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There are a number of options available to manage the patella when revising a failed total knee arthroplasty. If the previous patellar component is well-fixed, undamaged, not worn, and compatible with the femoral revision component, then it can be retained. When a patellar component necessitates revision and is removed with adequate remaining patellar bone stock, an onlay-type all-polyethylene cemented implant can be used. Management of the patella with severe bony deficiency remains controversial. Treatment options for the severely deficient patella include the use of a cemented all-polyethylene biconvex patellar prosthesis, patellar bone grafting and augmentation, patellar resection arthroplasty (patelloplasty), performing a gull-wing osteotomy, patellectomy, or the use of newer technology such as a tantalum (trabecular metal) patellar prosthesis. Severe patellar bone deficiency is a challenging situation because restoration of the extensor mechanism, proper patellar tracking, and satisfactory anatomic relationships with the femoral and tibial components are critical for an optimal clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712583      PMCID: PMC2565018          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0433-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  41 in total

1.  Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum.

Authors:  S A Hacking; J D Bobyn; K Toh; M Tanzer; J J Krygier
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-12-15

2.  Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; J H Lyon; J J Jacobs; R M Barden; E M Berkson; M B Sheinkop; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Use of a trabecular metal patella for marked patella bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Charles L Nelson; Jess H Lonner; Ashkan Lahiji; Jane Kim; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Press-fit metal-backed rotating patella: seven- to 14-year followup.

Authors:  James M Hartford; Charles Herfel; Herbert Kaufer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Outcome of metal-backed cementless patellar components: the effect of implant design.

Authors:  M J Kraay; O J Darr; M J Salata; V M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Patellar component resection arthroplasty for the severely compromised patella.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Michael J Seel; Arlen D Hanssen; Daniel J Berry; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA.

Authors:  R S J Burnett; J L Boone; K P McCarthy; S Rosenzweig; R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patellar options in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; C H Rorabeck; G A Engh
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  7 in total

1.  What Is the Risk of Repeat Revision When Patellofemoral Replacement Is Revised to TKA? An Analysis of 482 Cases From a Large National Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Stephen E Graves; Alana Cuthbert; David Parker; Peter Myers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Causes and management of patellar instability after total knee replacement : Lateralization, subluxation and luxation].

Authors:  K-D Heller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Patellar bone deficiency in revision total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Kloiber; E Goldenitsch; P Ritschl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  What Is the Role for Patelloplasty With Gullwing Osteotomy in Revision TKA?

Authors:  Jeremy M Gililland; Presley Swann; Christopher E Pelt; Jill Erickson; Nadia Hamad; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Angelos Assiotis; Kendrick To; Rhidian Morgan-Jones; Ioannis P Pengas; Wasim Khan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-13

6.  Revision knee surgery techniques.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  A classification-based approach to the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew W Tetreault; Christopher E Gross; Paul H Yi; Daniel D Bohl; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-08-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.