Literature DB >> 11953628

Patellar component resection arthroplasty for the severely compromised patella.

Javad Parvizi1, Michael J Seel, Arlen D Hanssen, Daniel J Berry, Bernard F Morrey.   

Abstract

When severe bone loss precludes reimplantation of a new patellar component during revision knee arthroplasty, the treatment options include patellar bone grafting, patellar component resection arthroplasty, and patellectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results of patellar component resection arthroplasty for the severely compromised patella for which insertion of another patellar component was not possible. Thirty-five knees (31 patients) were treated with patellar component resection arthroplasty for aseptic patellar component failure associated with severely compromised patellar bone stock. Followup averaged 7.9 years (range, 2-18 years). There was a significant improvement in Knee Society pain and function scores. Pain relief was more dramatic than functional improvement. The range of motion also improved significantly and in particular preoperative extensor lag was resolved in the majority of patients. Patients treated with isolated patellar resection arthroplasty were more likely to have continuing pain and require reoperation compared with patients who had concomitant revision of the tibial and femoral components. Correct positioning and the stability of tibial and femoral components should be tested carefully at the time of patellar resection arthroplasty and considered for revision if malpositioned either axially or rotationally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11953628     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-00041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Causes and management of patellar instability after total knee replacement : Lateralization, subluxation and luxation].

Authors:  K-D Heller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Achilles tendon allograft for augmentation of the Hanssen patellar bone grafting.

Authors:  Friedrich Boettner; Jad Bou Monsef
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  P Diehl; R Burgkart; T Klier; C Glowalla; H Gollwitzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Management of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan M Garcia; Matthew J Kraay; Patricia A Conroy-Smith; Victor M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Naeder Helmy; Carolyn Anglin; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The Relationship on Exercise Anticipation, Function and Self-efficacy in Patients After Knee Surgeries Over Six Months: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Xiaoying Chen; Dezhi Zheng; He Ma; Wen Luo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Recent advances and developments in knee surgery: principles of periprosthetic knee fracture management.

Authors:  Mukai Chimutengwende-Gordon; Wasim Khan; David Johnstone
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-07-27

8.  A classification-based approach to the patella in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew W Tetreault; Christopher E Gross; Paul H Yi; Daniel D Bohl; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.