Literature DB >> 18712423

Microbial community dynamics in uranium contaminated subsurface sediments under biostimulated conditions with high nitrate and nickel pressure.

David Moreels1, Garry Crosson, Craig Garafola, Denise Monteleone, Safiyh Taghavi, Jeffrey P Fitts, Daniel van der Lelie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: The subsurface at the Oak Ridge Field Research Center represents an extreme and diverse geochemical environment that places different stresses on the endogenous microbial communities, including low pH, elevated nitrate concentrations, and the occurrence of heavy metals and radionuclides, including hexavalent uranium [U(VI)]. The in situ immobilization of U(VI) in the aquifer can be achieved through microbial reduction to relatively insoluble U(IV). However, a high redox potential due to the presence of nitrate and the toxicity of heavy metals will impede this process. Our aim is to test biostimulation of the endogenous microbial communities to improve nitrate reduction and subsequent U(VI) reduction under conditions of elevated heavy metals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Column experiments were used to test the possibility of using biostimulation via the addition of ethanol as a carbon source to improve nitrate reduction in the presence of elevated aqueous nickel. We subsequently analyzed the composition of the microbial communities that became established and their potential for U(VI) reduction and its in situ immobilization.
RESULTS: Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the microbial population changed from heavy metal sensitive members of the actinobacteria, alpha- and gamma-proteobacteria to a community dominated by heavy metal resistant (nickel, cadmium, zinc, and cobalt resistant), nitrate reducing beta- and gamma-proteobacteria, and sulfate reducing Clostridiaceae. Coincidentally, synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy analyses indicated that the resulting redox conditions favored U(VI) reduction transformation to insoluble U(IV) species associated with soil minerals and biomass. DISCUSSION: This study shows that the necessary genetic information to adapt to the implemented nickel stress resides in the endogenous microbial population present at the Oak Ridge FRC site, which changed from a community generally found under oligotrophic conditions to a community able to withstand the stress imposed by heavy metals, while efficiently reducing nitrate as electron donor. Once nitrate was reduced efficient reduction and in situ immobilization of uranium was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that stimulating the metabolism of the endogenous bacterial population at the Oak Ridge FRC site by adding ethanol, a suitable carbon source, results in efficient nitrate reduction under conditions of elevated nickel, and a decrease of the redox potential such that sulfate and iron reducing bacteria are able to thrive and create conditions favorable for the reduction and in situ immobilization of uranium. Since we have found that the remediation potential resides within the endogenous microbial community, we believe it will be feasible to conduct field tests. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Biostimulation of endogenous bacteria provides an efficient tool for the successful in situ remediation of mixed-waste sites, particularly those co-contaminated with heavy metals, nitrate and radionuclides, as found in the United States and other countries as environmental legacies of the nuclear age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712423     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-008-0034-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  31 in total

1.  Change in bacterial community structure during in situ biostimulation of subsurface sediment cocontaminated with uranium and nitrate.

Authors:  Nadia N North; Sherry L Dollhopf; Lainie Petrie; Jonathan D Istok; David L Balkwill; Joel E Kostka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  DsrB gene-based DGGE for community and diversity surveys of sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Joke Geets; Brigitte Borremans; Ludo Diels; Dirk Springael; Jaco Vangronsveld; Daniel van der Lelie; Karolien Vanbroekhoven
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Microbiological and geochemical heterogeneity in an in situ uranium bioremediation field site.

Authors:  Helen A Vrionis; Robert T Anderson; Irene Ortiz-Bernad; Kathleen R O'Neill; Charles T Resch; Aaron D Peacock; Richard Dayvault; David C White; Philip E Long; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Nickel-resistance-based minitransposons: new tools for genetic manipulation of environmental bacteria.

Authors:  S Taghavi; H Delanghe; C Lodewyckx; M Mergeay; D van der Lelie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Microbial populations stimulated for hexavalent uranium reduction in uranium mine sediment.

Authors:  Yohey Suzuki; Shelly D Kelly; Kenneth M Kemner; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  NreB from Achromobacter xylosoxidans 31A Is a nickel-induced transporter conferring nickel resistance.

Authors:  G Grass; B Fan; B P Rosen; K Lemke; H G Schlegel; C Rensing
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  In-situ evidence for uranium immobilization and remobilization.

Authors:  John M Senko; Jonathan D Istok; Joseph M Suflita; Lee R Krumholz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Enumeration and characterization of iron(III)-reducing microbial communities from acidic subsurface sediments contaminated with uranium(VI).

Authors:  Lainie Petrie; Nadia N North; Sherry L Dollhopf; David L Balkwill; Joel E Kostka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Desulfitobacterium metallireducens sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium that couples growth to the reduction of metals and humic acids as well as chlorinated compounds.

Authors:  Kevin T Finneran; Heather M Forbush; Catherine V Gaw VanPraagh; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  11 in total

1.  Bacterial diversity and composition of an alkaline uranium mine tailings-water interface.

Authors:  Nurul H Khan; Viorica F Bondici; Prabhakara G Medihala; John R Lawrence; Gideon M Wolfaardt; Jeff Warner; Darren R Korber
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Microbial diversity in uranium mining-impacted soils as revealed by high-density 16S microarray and clone library.

Authors:  Gurdeep Rastogi; Shariff Osman; Parag A Vaishampayan; Gary L Andersen; Larry D Stetler; Rajesh K Sani
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Microbial links between sulfate reduction and metal retention in uranium- and heavy metal-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Jana Sitte; Denise M Akob; Christian Kaufmann; Kai Finster; Dipanjan Banerjee; Eva-Maria Burkhardt; Joel E Kostka; Andreas C Scheinost; Georg Büchel; Kirsten Küsel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  pH-dependent microbial reduction of uranium(VI) in carbonate-free solutions: UV-vis, XPS, TEM, and thermodynamic studies.

Authors:  Jinchuan Xie; Jianfeng Lin; Xiaohua Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Effects of Cd and Pb on soil microbial community structure and activities.

Authors:  Sardar Khan; Abd El-Latif Hesham; Min Qiao; Shafiqur Rehman; Ji-Zheng He
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Influence of uranium on bacterial communities: a comparison of natural uranium-rich soils with controls.

Authors:  Laure Mondani; Karim Benzerara; Marie Carrière; Richard Christen; Yannick Mamindy-Pajany; Laureline Février; Nicolas Marmier; Wafa Achouak; Pascal Nardoux; Catherine Berthomieu; Virginie Chapon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spatial distribution of an uranium-respiring betaproteobacterium at the Rifle, CO field research site.

Authors:  Nicole M Koribanics; Steven J Tuorto; Nora Lopez-Chiaffarelli; Lora R McGuinness; Max M Häggblom; Kenneth H Williams; Philip E Long; Lee J Kerkhof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metagenomics-Guided Survey, Isolation, and Characterization of Uranium Resistant Microbiota from the Savannah River Site, USA.

Authors:  Rajneesh Jaswal; Ashish Pathak; Bobby Edwards; Robert Lewis; John C Seaman; Paul Stothard; Kirill Krivushin; Jochen Blom; Oliver Rupp; Ashvini Chauhan
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Lateral Gene Transfer in a Heavy Metal-Contaminated-Groundwater Microbial Community.

Authors:  Christopher L Hemme; Stefan J Green; Lavanya Rishishwar; Om Prakash; Angelica Pettenato; Romy Chakraborty; Adam M Deutschbauer; Joy D Van Nostrand; Liyou Wu; Zhili He; I King Jordan; Terry C Hazen; Adam P Arkin; Joel E Kostka; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Comparative metagenomics reveals impact of contaminants on groundwater microbiomes.

Authors:  Christopher L Hemme; Qichao Tu; Zhou Shi; Yujia Qin; Weimin Gao; Ye Deng; Joy D Van Nostrand; Liyou Wu; Zhili He; Patrick S G Chain; Susannah G Tringe; Matthew W Fields; Edward M Rubin; James M Tiedje; Terry C Hazen; Adam P Arkin; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.