Literature DB >> 18712379

Entrance skin dose measured with MOSFETs in children undergoing interventional radiology procedures.

Diana Glennie1, Bairbre L Connolly, Christopher Gordon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interventional procedures frequently employ fluoroscopy or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Few studies have documented radiation doses received by children during these procedures.
OBJECTIVE: To measure skin entrance dose received during common pediatric interventional procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MOSFET dosimeters were placed to record skin doses in 143 children undergoing any of five procedures: 30 PICC insertions, 34 CVL/port insertions, 30 G/GJ tube insertions, 25 sclerotherapy/vascular anomaly procedures, 24 cerebral angiography procedures. The highest recorded dose (HRD) from the five MOSFET probes was assumed to be the peak skin dose per child. HRD values were averaged for children within each group and correlated with patient weight, fluoroscopy time and number of DSA frames.
RESULTS: Average HRD was 1.8 mGy for PICC insertions, 1.4 mGy for CVL/port insertions, 3.9 mGy for G/GJ tube insertions, 39.1 mGy for sclerotherapy/vascular anomaly procedures, and 149.9 and 101.6 mGy for frontal and lateral portions of cerebral angiography procedures. These entrance doses corresponded to effective dose estimates in the range 0.4-3 mSv. There were only modest correlations between peak skin dose and fluoroscopy time, patient weight and DSA frames (r (2)<0.4, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Pediatric interventional procedures are associated with a wide range of doses; those at the higher end require careful monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712379     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-0966-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  14 in total

1.  Skin dose and dose-area product values for interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  E Vano; L Gonzalez; J I Ten; J M Fernandez; E Guibelalde; C Macaya
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures.

Authors:  R A Geise; T J O'Dea
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Characterization of the angular response of an "isotropic" MOSFET dosimeter.

Authors:  Joel N Roshau; David E Hintenlang
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards.

Authors:  O H Suleiman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10

5.  Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry.

Authors:  Terry T Yoshizumi; Philip C Goodman; Donald P Frush; Giao Nguyen; Greta Toncheva; Maksudur Sarder; Lottie Barnes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Skin entrance radiation dose in an interventional radiology procedure.

Authors:  Robert Y L Chu; George Thomas; Feroz Maqbool
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography.

Authors:  Natalie A Swoboda; Derek G Armstrong; John Smith; Ellen Charkot; Bairbre L Connolly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-05-26

9.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Eric J Hall
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-07-19

10.  Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Patricia E Cole; Hollington T Lu; Beth A Schueler; Michael Geisinger; Alejandro Berenstein; Robin Albert; Jeffrey D Georgia; Patrick T Noonan; John F Cardella; James St George; Eric J Russell; Tim W Malisch; Robert L Vogelzang; George L Miller; Jon Anderson
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  7 in total

1.  A comparison of radiation exposure between diagnostic CTA and DSA examinations of cerebral and cervicocerebral vessels.

Authors:  A-L Manninen; J-M Isokangas; A Karttunen; T Siniluoto; M T Nieminen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Patient radiation doses and reference levels in pediatric interventional radiology.

Authors:  Bouchra Habib Geryes; Adeline Bak; Julie Lachaux; Augustin Ozanne; Nathalie Boddaert; Francis Brunelle; Olivier Naggara; Guillaume Saliou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Feasibility of optimized ultralow-dose pulsed fluoroscopy for upper gastrointestinal tract examinations: a phantom study with clinical correlation.

Authors:  Jakob Weiss; Andreas Pomschar; Carsten Rist; Klement Neumaier; Minglun Li; Wilhelm Flatz; Kolja Thierfelder; Mike Notohamiprodjo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Radiation dose associated with CT-guided drain placement for pediatric patients.

Authors:  Cody J Schwartz; Ari J Isaacson; Lynn Ansley Fordham; Marija Ivanovic; J Bradford Taylor; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-03-10

5.  Effective dose estimation for pediatric upper gastrointestinal examinations using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology.

Authors:  Brent Emigh; Christopher L Gordon; Bairbre L Connolly; Michelle Falkiner; Karen E Thomas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-26

6.  Effective dose estimation for pediatric voiding cystourethrography using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology.

Authors:  Ryan Lee; Karen E Thomas; Bairbre L Connolly; Michelle Falkiner; Christopher L Gordon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-02-25

7.  Measurement and comparison of skin dose using OneDose MOSFET and Mobile MOSFET for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Essam H Mattar; Lina F Hammad; Huda I Al-Mohammed
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.