Literature DB >> 18712355

Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and knee function 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts.

Riitta Lautamies1, Arsi Harilainen, Jyrki Kettunen, Jerker Sandelin, Urho M Kujala.   

Abstract

Existing clinical studies have not proven which graft is to be preferred in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In recent years, bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendons have been the most frequently used graft types. Muscle strength deficit is one of the consequences after ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength and knee function 5 years after ACL reconstruction between the BPTB and the STG groups. The study group consisted of 288 patients (132 women, 156 men) with a unilateral ACL rupture who had received a BPTB (175 patients) or STG (113 patients) ACL reconstruction. Lower extremity concentric isokinetic peak extension and flexion torques were assessed at the angular velocities of 60 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Tegner activity level, the Lysholm knee and the Kujala patellofemoral scores were also collected. Isokinetic quadriceps peak torque (percentage of the contralateral side) was 3.9% higher in the STG group than in the BPTB group at the velocity of 60 degrees /s and 3.2% higher at the velocity of 180 degrees /s and the isokinetic hamstring peak torque 2% higher in the BPTB group than in the STG group at the velocity of 60 degrees /s and 2.5% higher at the velocity of 180 degrees /s. In both groups the subjects had weaker quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength in the injured extremity compared with the uninjured one. In the single-leg hop test (according to the IKDC recommendations) there was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.040) between the groups. In the STG group, 68% of the patients had the single-leg hop ratio (injured vs. uninjured extremity) > or =90%, 31% of the patients 75-89% and 1% of the patients <75%, while in the BPTB group the corresponding percentages were 72, 21 and 7%. However, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome were found between the groups as determined by the IKDC, Tegner activity level, Lysholm knee and Kujala patellofemoral scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712355     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0598-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Hamstrings vs. patella tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D J Beard; J L Anderson; S Davies; A J Price; C A Dodd
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft.

Authors:  J A Feller; K E Webster; B Gavin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reflex inhibition of the quadriceps femoris muscle after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; P F De Luca; P R Williams; M E Eastlack; A R Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. A prospective randomized study of 107 patients.

Authors:  K Eriksson; P Anderberg; P Hamberg; P Olerud; T Wredmark
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods.

Authors:  A F Anderson; R B Snyder; A B Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.

Authors:  M E Eastlack; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Assessment of quadriceps/hamstring strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J L Seto; A S Orofino; M C Morrissey; J M Medeiros; W J Mason
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  R A Sachs; D M Daniel; M L Stone; R F Garfein
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  52 in total

1.  Comparison between Nintendo Wii Fit and conventional rehabilitation on functional performance outcomes after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Gul Baltaci; Gulcan Harput; Bunyamin Haksever; Burak Ulusoy; Hamza Ozer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Impaired Quadriceps Rate of Torque Development and Knee Mechanics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft.

Authors:  Paul W Kline; Kristin D Morgan; Darren L Johnson; Mary Lloyd Ireland; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  All-epiphyseal, all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique for skeletally immature patients.

Authors:  Moira M McCarthy; Jessica Graziano; Daniel W Green; Frank A Cordasco
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-11-22

5.  Knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of a rehabilitation protocol.

Authors:  F Gadea; D Monnot; B Quélard; R Mortati; M Thaunat; J M Fayard; B Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-07

Review 6.  Documentation of strength training for research purposes after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jesper Augustsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Knee flexor strength after ACL reconstruction: comparison between hamstring autograft, tibialis anterior allograft, and non-injured controls.

Authors:  Sarah Landes; John Nyland; Brian Elmlinger; Ed Tillett; David Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allograft: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Saroj Rai; Sheng-Yang Jin; Bimal Rai; Nira Tamang; Wei Huang; Xian-Zhe Liu; Chun-Qing Meng; Hong Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-20

9.  Clinical Outcome Measures and Return-to-Sport Timing in Adolescent Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Julie P Burland; Regina O Kostyun; Kyle J Kostyun; Matthew Solomito; Carl Nissen; Matthew D Milewski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Assessment of Quadriceps Corticomotor and Spinal-Reflexive Excitability in Individuals with a History of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Justin L Rush; Neal R Glaviano; Grant E Norte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.