Literature DB >> 11685356

Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft.

J A Feller1, K E Webster, B Gavin.   

Abstract

This study documented postoperative morbidity during the first 4 months following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autograft. Sixty-five patients undergoing primary arthroscopically assisted single-incision ACL reconstruction were randomized to have a central third bone patellar tendon bone autograft (PT) or a doubled semitendinosus/doubled gracilis autograft (HS). Postoperatively patients undertook a standard 'accelerated' rehabilitation protocol. Patients were reviewed after 2 weeks, 8 weeks, and 4 months. At each review the location and severity of general knee pain and the presence and severity of anterior knee pain (AKP) were recorded as were the presence and size of an effusion as well as the active and passive flexion and passive extension deficits compared to the contralateral limb. Pain on kneeling, KT-1000 measured side to side difference in anterior tibial displacement, isokinetic assessment of quadriceps and hamstring peak torque deficits, IKDC score and Cincinnati sports activity level were also recorded after 4 months. After 2 weeks more patients in the PT group complained of AKP and reported that the pain was more severe. After 8 weeks there was no significant difference between the groups for any variable. After 4 months the severity of general pain experienced and the incidence of pain on kneeling were greater in the PT group. The PT group also demonstrated a significantly greater quadriceps peak torque deficit at 240 degrees /s. IKDC scores were higher in the HS group, but Cincinnati sports activity scores were higher in the PT group. Although we observed a lower morbidity in the HS group, primarily related to pain, the severity of pain in both groups was relatively low and, in light of the higher mean sports activity level observed in the PT group at 4 months the clinical impact of the difference may not be significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11685356     DOI: 10.1007/s001670100216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Akihiro Hakozaki; Wataru Iwamoto; Hiroya Kanagawa; Hideo Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females: a comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller; Alasdair G Sutherland; Johanna Elliott
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  ACL reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring grafts--economical aspects.

Authors:  Magnus Forssblad; Anders Valentin; Björn Engström; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction.

Authors:  Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhong-tang Liu; Xian-long Zhang; Yao Jiang; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Dynamic joint loading following hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Rafael Gonzalez-Adrio; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of a rehabilitation protocol.

Authors:  F Gadea; D Monnot; B Quélard; R Mortati; M Thaunat; J M Fayard; B Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-07

8.  Age as a predictor of residual muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Kenji Shirakura; Takashi Horaguchi; Naoki Wada; Makoto Sohmiya; Masayuki Tazawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Magnetic resonance imagination of the peroneus longus tendon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Servet Kerimoğlu; Polat Koşucu; Murat Livaoğlu; Ismail Yükünç; Ahmet Uğur Turhan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Differences in the rehabilitation period following two methods of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs. ligamentum patellae.

Authors:  Tim Rose; Thomas Engel; Joachim Bernhard; Pierre Hepp; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.