Literature DB >> 18712321

[Laryngeal mask LMA Supreme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management].

A Timmermann1, S Cremer, J Heuer, U Braun, B M Graf, S G Russo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme (LMA-S) is a new disposable airway device that combines features of the LMA ProSeal (PLMA, gastric access) and LMA Fastrach (curved shaft to ease insertion) and has been available since April 2007.
METHODS: In a prospective study, 10 final year medical students or first year anesthesia residents, all with limited experience in LMA anesthesia, were requested to manage the airway of anesthetized female patients with the LMA-S size 4, who seemed normal on routine airway examination. Data collection included the success rates and duration for insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressures (OLP), fiber optic position and airway morbidity.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the study. Insertion of the LMA-S was possible in 27 (90%) patients at the first attempt and in 3 (10%) at the second attempt. Ventilation was established in 18.3 s (range 10-30 s, standard deviation +/-4.2 s). Insertion of a gastric tube was possible in all patients at the first attempt. Mean OLP at the level of 60 cmH2O cuff pressure was 29.1 cmH2O (range 21-35 cmH2O, standard deviation +/-4.8 cmH2O). Laryngeal fit evaluated by fiber optic control was rated as optimal in all patients both immediately after insertion of the LMA-S and after end of surgery. Three patients (10%) complained of mild sore throat. No patient reported dysphagia or dysphonia.
CONCLUSION: Insertion of the LMA-S was successful and possible in all patients in < or = 30 s with an optimal laryngeal fit, high OLPs and low airway morbidity. The LMA-S seems to be a device suitable for use in routine anesthesia and which can be safely used by medical personnel with limited clinical experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712321     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-008-1425-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  18 in total

1.  A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.

Authors:  Joseph Brimacombe; Christian Keller; Bernd Fullekrug; Felice Agrò; William Rosenblatt; Stephen F Dierdorf; Elvira Garcia de Lucas; Xavier Capdevilla; Nick Brimacombe
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Gum elastic bougie-guided placement of the ProSeal laryngeal mask.

Authors:  A Howath; J Brimacombe; C Keller; S Kihara
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  A comparison of the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel after manikin-only training.

Authors:  A Coulson; J Brimacombe; C Keller; L Wiseman; T Ingham; D Cheung; L Popwycz; B Hall
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.669

4.  The LMA Supreme--a pilot study.

Authors:  A van Zundert; J Brimacombe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask.

Authors:  M P Drage; J Nunez; R S Vaughan; T Asai
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position.

Authors:  J Brimacombe; A Berry
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training.

Authors:  Matthias Hohlrieder; Joseph Brimacombe; Achim von Goedecke; Christian Keller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  [The applicability of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies].

Authors:  A Borkowski; T Perl; J Heuer; A Timmermann; U Braun
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.698

9.  [LMA CTrach: initial experiences in patients with difficult-to-manage airways].

Authors:  A Timmermann; S Russo; U Natge; J Heuer; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.

Authors:  T M Cook; J P Nolan; C Verghese; P J Strube; M Lees; J M Millar; P J F Baskett
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of the Supraglottic Airway Devices Classic, Fastrach and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial of Efficacy, Safety and Complications.

Authors:  Erdal Kömür; Nurten Bakan; Şenay Göksu Tomruk; Gülşah Karaören; Zelin Topaç Doğan
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 2.  [Measurement of carbon dioxide in emergency medicine].

Authors:  A Timmermann; J C Brokmann; R Fitzka; E A Nickel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme(TM) Versus Unique(TM) in Edentulous Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Tangül Beydeş; Semih Küçükgüçlü; Şule Özbilgin; Bahar Kuvaki; Meltem Ademoğlu; Melek Sarı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  Laypersons can successfully place supraglottic airways with 3 minutes of training. A comparison of four different devices in the manikin.

Authors:  Gereon Schälte; Christian Stoppe; Meral Aktas; Mark Coburn; Steffen Rex; Marlon Schwarz; Rolf Rossaint; Norbert Zoremba
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Does a 4 diagram manual enable laypersons to operate the Laryngeal Mask Supreme®? A pilot study in the manikin.

Authors:  Gereon Schälte; Christian Stoppe; Rolf Rossaint; Laura Gilles; Maike Heuser; Steffen Rex; Mark Coburn; Norbert Zoremba; Annette Rieg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Layperson mouth-to-mask ventilation using a modified I-gel laryngeal mask after brief onsite instruction: a manikin-based feasibility trial.

Authors:  Gereon Schälte; Lilli-Theresa Bomhard; Rolf Rossaint; Mark Coburn; Christian Stoppe; Norbert Zoremba; Annette Rieg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Assessment of Neck Characteristics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Size Selection in Patients Who Underwent an Elective Ocular Surgery; A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Omid Aghadavoudi; Hamidreza Shetabi; Hamid Saryazdi; Susan Babayi
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2022-04

8.  The intuitive use of laryngeal airway tools by first year medical students.

Authors:  Johannes Bickenbach; Gereon Schälte; Stefan Beckers; Michael Fries; Matthias Derwall; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-22

9.  An Evaluation of Thyromental Distance-based Method or Weight-based Method in Determining the Size of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Meilin Weng; Ming Ding; Yajun Xu; Xijun Yang; Lihong Li; Jing Zhong; Changhong Miao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Incidence of postoperative sore throat after using a new technique of insertion of a second generation Laryngeal Mask Airway: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Li; Xiuli Wang; Ye Zhao; Zhenfei Jiang; Xueli Lv; Xinrui Nie; Tong Li; Xinghe Wang; Lingyun Dai; Su Liu
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.183

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.