Literature DB >> 16861434

Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training.

Matthias Hohlrieder1, Joseph Brimacombe, Achim von Goedecke, Christian Keller.   

Abstract

In the following pilot study, we compared conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation (tracheal intubation) and laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion (guided ProSeal) for airway management by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Five first-month residents with no practical experience of airway management were observed performing these techniques in 200 ASA I-II anesthetized, paralyzed adults. Each resident managed 40 patients, 20 in each group, in random order. The number of insertion attempts, effective airway time, ventilatory capability during pressure-controlled ventilation set at 15 cm H2O, airway trauma, and skill acquisition were studied. Data were collected by unblinded observers. Insertion was more frequently successful (100% versus 65%) and effective airway time was shorter (41 +/- 24 s versus 89 +/- 62 s) in the guided ProSeal group (both P < 0.0001). Expired tidal volume was larger (730 +/- 170 mL versus 560 +/- 140 mL) and end-tidal CO(2) lower (33 +/- 4 mm Hg versus 37 +/- 5 mm Hg) in the guided ProSeal group during pressure controlled ventilation (both P < 0.0001). Blood staining was more frequent on the laryngoscope (24% versus 2%; P < 0.0001) in the tracheal intubation group. There was evidence for skill acquisition in both groups. We conclude that laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for airway management in terms of insertion success, expired tidal volume, and airway trauma by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. The guided ProSeal technique has potential for cardiopulmonary resuscitation by novices when conventional intubation fails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16861434     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000223679.14471.6c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

1.  [Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity].

Authors:  J F Heuer; M Stiller; J Rathgeber; C Eich; K Züchner; M Bauer; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Comparison of bougie-guided insertion of Proseal laryngeal mask airway with digital technique in adults.

Authors:  Anand Kuppusamy; Naheed Azhar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01

3.  Airtraq, LMA CTrach and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation Training: A Randomized Comparative Manikin Study.

Authors:  Ayten Saraçoğlu; Didem Dal; Ömer Baygın; Fevzi Yılmaz Göğüş
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-04-01

4.  [Laryngeal mask LMA Supreme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management].

Authors:  A Timmermann; S Cremer; J Heuer; U Braun; B M Graf; S G Russo
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Use of Airtraq, C-Mac, and Glidescope laryngoscope is better than Macintosh in novice medical students' hands: A manikin study.

Authors:  Abdullah M Kaki; Waleed A Almarakbi; Hazem M Fawzi; Abdulaziz M Boker
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-10

6.  Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Yi Feng; Yanyan Zhou
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Transfer of skills and comparison of performance between king vision® video laryngoscope and macintosh blade following an AHA airway management course.

Authors:  Lukas E Wolf; José A Aguirre; Christian Vogt; Christian Keller; Alain Borgeat; Heinz R Bruppacher
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Efficacy of Pentax airway scope versus Macintosh laryngoscope when used by novice personnel: A prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Kyu Nam Kim; Mi Ae Jeong; You Na Oh; Soo Yeon Kim; Ji Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Learning and performance of endotracheal intubation by paramedical students: Comparison of GlideScope(®) and intubating laryngeal mask airway with direct laryngoscopy in manikins.

Authors:  Adil Omar Bahathiq; Tharwat Helmy Abdelmontaleb; Mohammed Khairt Newigy
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05

10.  Pediatric Trainees Managing a Difficult Airway: Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway, Direct, and Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Art Ambrosio; Kastley Marvin; Colleen Perez; Chelsie Byrnes; Cory Gaconnet; Chris Cornelissen; Matthew Brigger
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2017-05-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.