Literature DB >> 16493550

[LMA CTrach: initial experiences in patients with difficult-to-manage airways].

A Timmermann1, S Russo, U Natge, J Heuer, B M Graf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Intubating LMA was designed to facilitate blind intubation and to provide ventilation between two intubation attempts. However, blind intubation can be associated with a risk of oesophageal penetration, therefore, a flexible bronchoscope is frequently used to assist tracheal intubation. This leads to increased burdens on materials and personal resources and prolongs intubation times. Hence the LMA CTrach laryngeal mask airway (CTrach) was developed with an integrated fibreoptic system which can be connected to a monitor for visualisation of the larynx during intubation.
METHODS: We detail the initial experience gained with the practical handling of the CTrach and the application in 10 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Laryngeal views were graduated in a CTrach-specific classification from grade I (clear view of the arytenoids, glottis and epiglottis) to grade IV (no part of the larynx can be identified). Adjusting manoeuvres were defined to improve the view of laryngeal structures.
RESULTS: All patients could be successfully ventilated with the CTrach. Ventilation quality was rated adequate in nine and possible in one patient. The initial distribution of the laryngeal view between grades I-IV was 1/2/1/6 and after adjusting manoeuvres to improve the laryngeal view the grade distribution was 3/5/0/2. Intubation through the CTrach was successful in all patients, nine at first and one at the second attempt.
CONCLUSION: In this small sample of patients with difficult-to-manage airways, the CTrach yielded high success rates for both ventilation and tracheal intubation. Adjusting manoeuvres can improve the laryngeal view further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16493550     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-0972-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  17 in total

1.  The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA): disadvantage of being a blind technique.

Authors:  V Dimitriou; G S Voyagis
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) seems to be an ideal device for blind intubation in case of immobile spine.

Authors:  F Möller; A H Andres; H Langenstein
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  The ILMA in pre-hospital care.

Authors:  Roderick Mackenzie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Light-guided intubation via the intubating laryngeal mask using a prototype illuminated flexible catheter. Clinical experience in 400 patients.

Authors:  V Dimitriou; G S Voyagis
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 5.  [Methods of airway management in prehospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  W Keul; M Bernhard; A Völkl; R Gust; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  The intubating laryngeal mask. I: Development of a new device for intubation of the trachea.

Authors:  A I Brain; C Verghese; E V Addy; A Kapila
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways.

Authors:  D Z Ferson; W H Rosenblatt; M J Johansen; I Osborn; A Ovassapian
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  R S Cormack; J Lehane
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  A comparison of blind and lightwand-guided tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask.

Authors:  S Kihara; S Watanabe; N Taguchi; A Suga; J R Brimacombe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  The intubating laryngeal mask airway with and without fiberoptic guidance.

Authors:  H S Joo; D K Rose
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Airway management].

Authors:  G Schälte; S Rex; D Henzler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity].

Authors:  J F Heuer; M Stiller; J Rathgeber; C Eich; K Züchner; M Bauer; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  The LMA CTrach™ in morbidly obese and lean patients undergoing gynecological procedures: a comparative study.

Authors:  Tulay Sahin Yildiz; Dilek Ozdamar; Ipek Arslan; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  [Laryngeal mask LMA Supreme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management].

Authors:  A Timmermann; S Cremer; J Heuer; U Braun; B M Graf; S G Russo
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation.

Authors:  David W Healy; Oana Maties; David Hovord; Sachin Kheterpal
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.